Owner reviews for tires

Manufacturers

137

Reviews

15394

Best manufacturers by properties

Noise

Continental

4.0

Grip

MICHELIN

4.3

Ride comfort

MICHELIN

Manufacturers

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

Show all

Part:

Back

Manufacturer:

Back

Make:

Back

Model:

Back

Generation:

Review tone

Positive Negative Neutral

Reviews found: 0

Reviews

Relevant

New

Helpful

MICHELIN › Tires

DeepFizz 21 Oct 2025, 15:35

Rating 5.0

The Michelin Defender tires have settled in well. As you can see, I’m getting significantly better efficiency now that the tires have a few thousand miles on them. 6000 miles in and they are down to 10 mm on tread. Factory tread is 11 mm so I’m very happy with the wear so far. Especially considering the Pirellis only lasted 23k miles. Picture 3, with 12,000 miles is the last 12,000 mile efficiency rating on the Pirelli’s. Picture 2 is the first 3000 miles on the Michelins. I am shocked to see the difference, as I was expecting a loss of efficiency with the Defenders. The data is trending and showing they are in fact a better efficiency tire vs the factory Pirellis. 50 cold psi is a must IMO.

Pros: better efficiency, good wear

Mileage: 9656 km

BRIDGESTONE › Tires

MonStarEvolve 21 Oct 2025, 15:15

Rating 5.0

Grip:

Felt good, real frigging good on the Bridgestones compared to the Falkens. I love Falkens for the price but had to be competitive and it was my first time on Potenza rubber and I don't know if I can go back. I was able to left foot brake so well through the elements and folks on the cones said I was absolutely 3-wheeling through the sweepers, so nice to feel the front end grip and hold.

Pros: good front end grip, excellent hold, competitive performance

Vehicle: Volkswagen

Goodyear › Tires

Slimpickins9594 21 Oct 2025, 14:59

Rating 5.0

Grip:

I've had nothing but good experiences with Goodyear Wrangler Duratracs on our 3rd gen, 5th gen, and two trucks. Bonus that you can get them studded if you're running a dedicated winter setup or live in weather that requires it.

Pros: good experiences, can be studded

Goodyear › Tires

Infamous_Ad8730 21 Oct 2025, 14:21

Rating 4.5

Grip:

Had them on my old Ranger and had zero issues on road and 2wd off road camping, and dirt biking. I even got 60k miles out of them (and they still looked pretty good). Very good bang for the buck.

Pros: zero issues, long life, good value

Vehicle: Ford Ranger

Mileage: 60000 km

BFGoodrich › Tires

No_Original5693 21 Oct 2025, 14:20

Rating 5.0

Grip:

Southern Maine here. The KO3s I’m currently running are terrific in both rain and snow. Every bit as good as the old AT3W in both. Only time I went 4hi last winter was on a particularly twisty/hilly part of my commute (narrow two lane rd) and that had more to do with me being overly cautious, not because it was slipping

Pros: terrific in rain, terrific in snow

Vehicle: Toyota 4runner

Nokia › Tires

JonoInTheCellar 21 Oct 2025, 14:18

Rating 4.5

Grip:

The Nokian AT tires are pretty great. They’re AT tires made with a snow tire compound.

Pros: pretty great, good snow compound

MICHELIN › Tires

nowaybrose 21 Oct 2025, 12:50

Rating 4.5

Grip:
Noise:

The Michelin LTX aren’t much to look at, but they have tons of those little sipes in there and make for a low-key snow tire in my experience. Also sound good on the highway

Pros: good in snow, quiet on highway

Cons: not much to look at

Nexen › Tires

Throwawaysack2 19 Mar 2025, 01:07

Rating 3.0

Grip:
Ride comfort:

BFG is definitely a class above the Nexen. Sure Nexen has never issued a recall but they make very mid car tires imo, underrated truck tires tho and excellent quality control.

Pros: excellent quality control

Cons: very mid car tires

BFGoodrich › Tires

No-Disaster1829 14 Jan 2025, 22:19

Rating 1.0

Grip:
Noise:
Ride comfort:

KO2’s. Hard to balance, super noisey, terrible in rain and killed my gas mileage. Front tire blew out the sidewall going down the highway at 75 mph. Am running Continental Contacts A/T now. They’re awesome.

Cons: hard to balance, noisey

Goodyear › Tires

Captain_Aizen 14 Jan 2025, 22:12

Rating 1.0

2009 Goodyear run flat low profile tires. The ideal with "run flats" is that if you get a nail or something you can still drive on the tire at reduced speed safely for a short time. The problem is that the tires were incredibly fragile and barely lasted 10,000 mi before catastrophically just shredding apart on their own. And because they would shred apart in such horrific ways the sidewall of the tire would often damage sensors or other things underneath the car, making the repair cost 10x what it normally would be. Also the tires themselves cost several times more than a normal tire. One of the biggest money pits of my life, I can't believe I let the dealers talk me into that but at the time they made it sound like a wonder tire that would last extra long and be extra safe. It was literally the exact opposite ????

Pros: none

Cons: fragile, shredding apart

Mileage: 10000 km