Reviews of K&N parts For Business

Average Rating ?

3.9

Manufacturer Ranking

#90

Reviews

429

Spare Parts

Country

USA

Spare Parts

Oil filter Fram or K&N

Oil filter Mann or K&N

Air filter Mann or K&N

Air filter K&N or Fram

Air filter K&N or Wix

Air filter K&N or UGREEN

Show all

Part:

Back

Manufacturer:

Back

Make:

Back

Model:

Back

Generation:

Review tone

Positive Negative Neutral

Reviews found: 0

Reviews

Relevant

New

Useful

K&N › Air filter

rastta 27 Jun 2002, 23:06

Rating 4.5

Visible dirt:

I've run K&N's in my carS for over 20 years including 5 VW's and Audi's and NEVER had a MAF failure until the one on my TT recently. HMMM. My A4 1.8T has had a K&N in it for 45k+ and it's running fine. No doubt if you don't oil the K&N correctly and submerge it in oil you will run into problems.

Pros: long-term reliability, no MAF failures

Cons: problems if oiled incorrectly

Vehicle: Audi A4

Mileage: 72420 km

K&N › Air filter

andyA6 25 Jun 2002, 15:31

Rating 4.0

Power:

10,000 mls plus, no problems. Performance? Hm, maybe a bit since I'm chipped.

Pros: no problems, good longevity

Cons: uncertain performance gain

Vehicle: Audi A6

Mileage: 10000 km

K&N › Air filter

MB300E87 14 Jun 2002, 08:47

Rating 5.0

Power:
Visible dirt:

before i got my car i was used to having my I6 powered 300E. having six cylinders was great and i could maintain 90mph for hours on end. i just went from southern CA to the bay area a couple days ago. the 1.8T did great! did much better than expected. i had just had my 15k service the day before i left too. stock air filter was in because i forgot to put the K&N back in. when i got back though i saw how much dust was on the stock filter after the trip so i was glad to save the K&N. anyway back on track, would have been nice to have 6 cylinders on the open road but the 1.8T was great. i kept it at 80-85mph the whole time. 6+hrs.

Pros: 1.8T did great

Mileage: 15000 km

K&N › Air filter

GaltLine 19 Apr 2002, 03:04

Rating 4.0

I've had the K&N in my V6 for the last 50,000 miles without any problems. When it came time to clean it I let it dry thoroughly (over 24 hours) before oiling, lightly oiled it, and let it soak in thoroughly before installing.

Pros: no problems, good longevity

Cons: requires careful cleaning/oiling

Vehicle: Volkswagen Passat

Mileage: 50000 km

K&N › Air filter

Reason 18 Apr 2002, 23:19

Rating 4.5

Power:

The K&N in my 2002 Passat has been working great for the past, uh, 300 miles.

Pros: working great

Vehicle: Volkswagen Passat

Mileage: 300 km

K&N › Air filter

2kjettaguy 5 Apr 2002, 02:39

Rating 5.0

Power:

I just threw in a k&n.

Pros: null

Cons: null

K&N › Air filter

Datic 29 Jan 2002, 16:25

Rating 5.0

I've had a K&N drop in in my 99 1.8t since new, and I now have 70,000 miles on it. I've not had any problems with the MAF or anything else like that.

Pros: no problems with MAF

Vehicle: Volkswagen

Mileage: 112654 km

K&N › Air filter

JB's Turbo 25 Jan 2002, 22:20

Rating 5.0

Power:
Throttle response:

I can tell a HUGE difference in proformance between my K&N and paper air filter. The K&N is a whole lot better. I want it back.

Pros: whole lot better

Vehicle: Volkswagen Beetle

K&N › Air filter

jlynch 19 Mar 2002, 04:51

Rating 0.5

Power:

I installed per instructions a K&N air filter to my 2000 VW Passat. Upon Driving the first 3 hours after installation my check engine light illuminated and a warning message appeared on my trip computer stating "Emissions Workshop!" VW stated that the error was a result of a faulty air mass sensor. It was determined by VW that Oil from the K&N filter had fouled the sensor and the sensor could not be cleaned. I now wish that I had not installed your product at all, because now at this point I am screwed. I am also out $579.41 for less than 3 hours of use of your product.

Cons: fouled MAF sensor, check engine light, costly repair, short lifespan

Vehicle: Volkswagen Passat