Owner reviews for tires

Manufacturers

137

Reviews

15394

Best manufacturers by properties

Noise

Continental

4.0

Grip

MICHELIN

4.3

Ride comfort

MICHELIN

Manufacturers

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

Show all

Part:

Back

Manufacturer:

Back

Make:

Back

Model:

Back

Generation:

Review tone

Positive Negative Neutral

Reviews found: 0

Reviews

Relevant

New

Helpful

Firestone › Tires

MP-Omnis 18 Feb 2025, 20:06

Rating 4.0

Grip:

Yeah, I have 20k with these on my Mazda6 and I wouldn't say they're unresponsive. In fact I would say they're quite responsive in that they like to track in the direction you're turning, so the car gets encouraged to dive into turns. One thing I have noticed is that they feel much more dead if you let them get low. Keep them at 36psi.

Pros: quite responsive, encourages turns

Cons: feel dead when low

Vehicle: Mazda 6

Mileage: 20000 km

Firestone › Tires

anxiousauditor 18 Feb 2025, 18:48

Rating 4.0

Grip:

I’m glad the series asked Firestone for a bigger differential in pace between the reds and blacks. A lot of the time last year it seemed largely negligible.

Pros: bigger pace differential

Cons: pace largely negligible

Hankook › Tires

FearTheClown5 18 Feb 2025, 17:59

Rating 4.0

Noise:
Ride comfort:

The Hankooks are slightly softer absorbing a smidge more of the road. Noise difference between the 2 isn't noticeable at all. The Hankooks are slightly more efficient, lifetime on the Michelins is 306whm and the Hankooks are 297whm(tracked via TeslaMate).

Pros: slightly more efficient

Cons: slightly softer

Falken › Tires

Murder_Hobo_LS77 18 Feb 2025, 02:01

Rating 4.0

Grip:
Noise:

I'm 3k miles in on my 23 pro. 285/75/16's w/ spacers.

The Falken's are quieter.

They gave better grip in wet and icy conditions.

They did result in a very mild mpg hit.

Pros: quieter, better grip

Cons: mild mpg hit

Mileage: 4828 km

Cooper › Tires

Devastate89 18 Feb 2025, 00:53

Rating 4.0

Grip:

I just put 4 255/45R19's Cooper pro controls on my 2015 ford taurus limited. I live in Wisconsin and it's winter so I got to test them in the snow. Not bad for all seasons. I've driven with Bridgestone Blizzak winter tires and they're for sure not at that level but good enough grip, I felt confident ish in deep snow.

Pros: good enough grip

Cons: not Blizzak level

Vehicle: Ford Taurus

GENERAL TIRE › Tires

alabamaterp 17 Feb 2025, 22:35

Rating 5.0

Grip:

Wow, someone else asking about the General Altimax. the answer is YES! they are an excellent brand for the value. I have a 2002 Mercedes S500. They are wonderful tires and held up better than the Michelin or Goodyears. Excellent wet traction for a rear wheel drive car. I swear by them.

Pros: excellent wet traction

Vehicle: Mercedes

DUNLOP › Tires

92_sin 17 Feb 2025, 21:38

Rating 5.0

Grip:

Der Satz Reifen Dunlop Sport Maxx RT (nicht der 2er) hat mich das letzte Mal in den Dimensionen 225/40 R18 91Y knapp unter 300 Euro gekostet.

Pros: knapp unter 300 Euro

Vehicle: Audi A3

NITTO › Tires

Buildinggam 12 Jun 2024, 20:37

Rating 3.0

Grip:

Reason I'm asking is I'm running Nitto NeoGens 280tw (205/50/15) on a fairly light, low horsepower car (D15B7 Del Sol). I've had alignments done, check my air pressure every other time I get gas (35psi) and I'm at the wear bars in 12k miles.

Cons: wear bars in 12k miles

Vehicle: Honda

Mileage: 12000 km

Hankook › Tires

InterestConsistent 17 Jan 2024, 07:49

Rating 1.0

Grip:

Also in Colorado with 50e. Have 21-inch wheels with factory Hankook “all season” performance run flats. Just ordered a set of Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5s for winter to replace the Hankooks that perform like I’m on an ice rink with bald tires…

Pros: for winter

Cons: perform like on ice

Vehicle: BMW X5