Brake pads ATE or Raybestos

Filter

Part:

Brake pads
Back
  • loading...

Manufacturer:

All
Back
  • loading...

Make:

Select make
Back
  • loading...

Generation:

Select generation
  • Vectra
  • Mokka
  • Antara
  • Astra
  • SPORTS TOURER
  • Meriva
  • Zafira Tourer
Review tone
Reviews found: 0
Raybestos Brake pads

Yeah, for wipers, it's usually a gradual decline but once they start to go, it's quick; I usually look for any hazing or small spots that don't clear right away, which is a lot more obvious than trying to gauge wear on something like brake pads where you just trust a good brand like raybestos to do its job.

Pros: trust a good brand
Cons: gradual decline
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Raybestos Brake pads

This might not be a popular opinion, but I've never had any problems with my OEM pads or rotors. Truck had the original OEM pads and rotors on it when I bought it, when those wore out I put Raybestos ones on and I was definitely not impressed with their performance. I switched back to OEM and have been happy ever since.

Pros: no problems, happy with performance
Cons: not impressed with performance
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
ATE Brake pads
miniCotulla
Rating 3.0
  • Braking:
  • Dust:

Meiner Erfahrung nach bremst das genauso gut wie andere Bremsen, das Problem ist nach 10tkm sportlicher Fahrweise sind Bel\u00e4ge und Scheiben leer, normale Fahrweise max 20tkm. Felgen Kohlschwarz weil nat\u00fcrlich mega viel Bremsstaub in kurzer Zeit.

Pros: bremst genauso gut
Cons: Bel\u00e4ge und Scheiben leer
Mileage: 10000 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Raybestos Brake pads
g26okie
Rating 2.0
  • Braking:

I had bad luck with a set of raybestos I put on my Tlx. Vibrations after 3k miles. Rebedded them, vibes again in 3k.

Cons: vibrations after 3k miles
Vehicle: Acura TLX
Mileage: 3000 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 15

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Comparisons
Show all

Activity feed

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake discs WAGNER has only 5 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake pads NIPPARTS got the first review!

The brake discs Hella got the first review!

The brake discs Hella Pagid has only 4 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake caliper Raybestos has only 9 reviews. Maybe add one more?

For tires OEM Toyota already 25 reviews.

For tires IRONMAN already 25 reviews.

In the rating best ignition coil already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!

In the rating best turbocharger already 4 brands participate!

In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for BMW M2 already 5 brands participate!

The manual transmission OEM FORD has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The brake discs Tesla has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The tie rods 555 has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The engine oil AMSOIL already has 1000 votes!

The brake pads OEM Subaru already has 250 votes!

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

The engine radiator MISHIMOTO already has 300 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

Which brake pads to choose — ATE or Raybestos?

If choosing brake pads across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare brake pads across these categories:

Comparison of brake pads ATE and Raybestos
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which brake pads are better — Raybestos or ATE?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads ATE were overall better than Raybestos.

  1. ATE received a PR Score of 87 out of 100, and Raybestos scored 80 points.
  2. ATE ranked 11 in the overall ranking, and Raybestos ranked 10.
  3. The average rating is higher for ATE (4.2) than for Raybestos (3.9).
  4. Brake pads ATE have better feature ratings than Raybestos:
    • Noise - owners believe, that this property for Raybestos is better than ATE.
    • Braking - drivers claim, that this property for ATE is outperforms Raybestos.
    • Dust - reviews suggest, that this property for ATE is preferred to Raybestos.

Which brake pads are more popular — ATE or Raybestos?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads Raybestos were overall more popular than ATE.

By vote balance, brake pads Raybestos surpassed ATE:

  • For ATE, the ratio of positive (154) to negative (22) votes is 132 votes.
  • For Raybestos, the ratio of positive (219) to negative (54) votes is 165 votes.

By number of reviews, brake pads Raybestos surpassed ATE:

Which brake pads do car owners prefer — ATE or Raybestos?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, brake pads ATE led more car-specific ratings than Raybestos:

ATE are chosen by owners of cars such as: BMW M4, Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Polo, and others.

Raybestos are chosen by owners of cars such as: Jeep Compass, and others.

Other comparisons of brake pads

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of brake pads ATE with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.

Also available: comparisons of brake pads Raybestos with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.

You can also see who is better among other brake pads manufacturers: EBC or POWER STOP, EBC or Akebono, EBC or Hawk Performance, Brembo or EBC, Akebono or POWER STOP.

Loading...