Brake pads ATE or Tesla
For normal driving I'd recommend either ATE Ceramic pads, paired with ATE, painted or coated discs.
Get Ate ceramic. never (almost never) have to wash your wheels again
Will not go back. Love to quick launch, quiet drive, no maintenance. Still on original disks and PADS at 180,000 km (120k miles)
Brakes and hoses ATE.
My Tesla has huge rear brakes I hardly ever use. The factory brake pads still look brand new after all these miles. Rear brakes are pointless if you have regen braking.
I also suggest you to buy ATE or TRW pads, because cheap stuff might squeak.
Meiner Erfahrung nach bremst das genauso gut wie andere Bremsen, das Problem ist nach 10tkm sportlicher Fahrweise sind Bel\u00e4ge und Scheiben leer, normale Fahrweise max 20tkm. Felgen Kohlschwarz weil nat\u00fcrlich mega viel Bremsstaub in kurzer Zeit.
Oh, I did have rust pop on one of the original brake pads so I had to replace that this spring - very little pad wear though!
To be fair Tesla brakes are not great. Combined with regen? Sure it’s adequate, but drive a German vehicle and see what brakes are about.
I had a colleague with brake failure on a model 3. The first thing he did after insurance paying for the crash, and hearing he'd be out of his car for at least 3 months was to order a real car, a Mazda.
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Which brake pads to choose — ATE or Tesla?
If choosing brake pads across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare brake pads across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which brake pads are better — Tesla or ATE?
In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads ATE were overall better than Tesla.
- ATE received a PR Score of 87 out of 100, and Tesla scored 65 points.
- ATE ranked 11 in the overall ranking, and Tesla ranked 34.
- The average rating is higher for ATE (4.2) than for Tesla (3.6).
-
Brake pads ATE have better feature ratings than Tesla:
- Noise - owners believe, that this property for ATE is better than Tesla.
- Braking - drivers claim, that this property for ATE is outperforms Tesla.
- Dust - reviews suggest, that this property for ATE is preferred to Tesla.
Which brake pads are more popular — ATE or Tesla?
In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads ATE were overall more popular than Tesla.
By vote balance, brake pads ATE surpassed Tesla:
- For ATE, the ratio of positive (154) to negative (22) votes is 132 votes.
- For Tesla, the ratio of positive (70) to negative (37) votes is 33 votes.
By number of reviews, brake pads ATE surpassed Tesla:
- For brake pads ATE there are 56 reviews: 46 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative.
- For brake pads Tesla there are 33 reviews: 18 positive, 8 neutral, 7 negative.
Which brake pads do car owners prefer — ATE or Tesla?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, brake pads ATE led more car-specific ratings than Tesla:
ATE are chosen by owners of cars such as: BMW M4, Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Polo, and others.
Brake pads Tesla have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.
Other comparisons of brake pads
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of brake pads ATE with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.
Also available: comparisons of brake pads Tesla with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.
You can also see who is better among other brake pads manufacturers: EBC or POWER STOP, EBC or Akebono, EBC or Hawk Performance, Brembo or EBC, Akebono or POWER STOP.