Brake pads ATE or Textar
For normal driving I'd recommend either ATE Ceramic pads, paired with ATE, painted or coated discs.
Get Ate ceramic. never (almost never) have to wash your wheels again
I did them myself for $600, Textar pads and Zimmerman rotors.
Brakes and hoses ATE.
I also suggest you to buy ATE or TRW pads, because cheap stuff might squeak.
If you’ve still got UFO fronts the part number for pads is ATE 602847 (13.0460-2847.2)
Textar
Meiner Erfahrung nach bremst das genauso gut wie andere Bremsen, das Problem ist nach 10tkm sportlicher Fahrweise sind Bel\u00e4ge und Scheiben leer, normale Fahrweise max 20tkm. Felgen Kohlschwarz weil nat\u00fcrlich mega viel Bremsstaub in kurzer Zeit.
Textar makes good pads but they get brake dust everywhere. They are currently the stock ones on my 23 m40i.
Well, I just put Textar pads on and am looking to swap them because they\u2019re super dusty and squeal with light pressure, so I too would love some recommendations.
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Which brake pads to choose — ATE or Textar?
If choosing brake pads across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare brake pads across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which brake pads are better — Textar or ATE?
In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads ATE were overall better than Textar.
- ATE received a PR Score of 87 out of 100, and Textar scored 74 points.
- ATE ranked 11 in the overall ranking, and Textar ranked 22.
- The average rating is higher for ATE (4.2) than for Textar (3.8).
-
Brake pads ATE have better feature ratings than Textar:
- Noise - owners believe, that this property for Textar is better than ATE.
- Braking - drivers claim, that by this property ATE does not differ from Textar.
- Dust - reviews suggest, that this property for ATE is preferred to Textar.
Which brake pads are more popular — ATE or Textar?
In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads ATE were overall more popular than Textar.
By vote balance, brake pads ATE surpassed Textar:
- For ATE, the ratio of positive (154) to negative (22) votes is 132 votes.
- For Textar, the ratio of positive (104) to negative (35) votes is 69 votes.
By number of reviews, brake pads ATE surpassed Textar:
- For brake pads ATE there are 56 reviews: 46 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative.
- For brake pads Textar there are 44 reviews: 30 positive, 7 neutral, 7 negative.
Which brake pads do car owners prefer — ATE or Textar?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, brake pads ATE led more car-specific ratings than Textar:
ATE are chosen by owners of cars such as: BMW M4, Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Polo, and others.
Brake pads Textar have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.
Other comparisons of brake pads
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of brake pads ATE with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.
Also available: comparisons of brake pads Textar with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.
You can also see who is better among other brake pads manufacturers: EBC or POWER STOP, EBC or Akebono, EBC or Hawk Performance, Brembo or EBC, Akebono or POWER STOP.