Tires Continental or Nokia

Filter

Part:

Tires
Back
  • loading...

Manufacturer:

All
Back
  • loading...

Make:

Select make
Back
  • loading...

Generation:

Select generation
  • Vectra
  • Mokka
  • Antara
  • Astra
  • SPORTS TOURER
  • Meriva
  • Zafira Tourer
Review tone
Reviews found: 0
Continental Tires
Maringosan
Rating 4.0
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:

Continental DWS. Gave up some responsiveness but rides on clouds now. Much more compliant on the roads now (19 inch wheels)

Pros: rides on clouds
Cons: gave up responsiveness
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Nokia Tires

Winter tires are best in class, their Hakkapeliitta 10 and R3/R5 line is the best in the world right now, their summer tires are very good, up there with the high-end brands maybe not as good as top-end Michelin or Continentals but still very good.

Pros: winter tires best in class
Cons: summer tires not top-end
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Nokia Tires

I use Nokian Hakkapelliita R3 winter tires in the winter (in Michigan) and they've worked great.

I previously tried Michelin CrossClimate2 tires, but they didn't provide quite enough snow traction. On packed, compacted snow, I could feel the car just barely sliding if I changed lanes, and I occasionally felt the ABS when braking. With the Nokian winter tires, I never feel either of those phenomena.

Pros: worked great, no sliding
Cons: Michelin not enough traction
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Nokia Tires

I had Nokian WRG2s on my Subaru and loved them. I run blizzaks on my truck now and find them to be better than the nokians were.

Pros: loved them
Cons: Blizzaks are better
Vehicle: Subaru
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Continental Tires
UStayThirstyMyFriend
Rating 4.0
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:

For my 2011 Element AWD, switched from the original Goodyears to Continental Control Contact in 235/65/16 (calculated for appropriate aspect ratio). No rubbing in the wheel wells. Better ride and traction.

Pros: better ride, better traction
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Continental Tires

I have the SL4 with the the 51’s and gp5000 32c”s. I highly recommended, I’m glad i spent the extra for pro’s and I’m also glad I went with the deep rims instead of the 37’s. It’s plenty fast and I’m really pleased with the setup.

Pros: plenty fast, pleased with setup
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Continental Tires

If you really want a budget tire I’d recommend the Continental extreme contacts... I have them on my R for daily driving and they’ve been great. I’m right around 494 WHP and they have excellent traction in a straight line and turning. It’s actually pretty hard to get them to spin

Pros: excellent traction, great performance
Cons: less treadwear, more expensive
Vehicle: Ford
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Continental Tires
CE
Rating 4.5
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:

Conti Extrem contat DWS 06 + Been using them in several sets on many VW's great water and grip, long lasting with great traction tire rack, 2 year road hazard, cus our roads suck, I took out one in a giant crater on teh NJ Tpk (and ya PAY high tolls for a **** road) tire rack hazard covered it, new tire next day check a wek later, had VW dealer mount and balance $16...all better

Pros: great water grip, long lasting, great traction, good road hazard coverage
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Continental Tires

My biggest complaint about the Conti DWS's is their softer sidewall. I prefer a stiffer sidewall for a better turn-in. Other than that, I have heard good things about the Conti's.

Pros: heard good things
Cons: softer sidewall
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Continental Tires
dubdaze68
Rating 1.0
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:

Every set of Contis and Michelins I have ever seen wear for absolute crap, lose all of their grip after a short amount of mileage, poorly riding, compromised in handling, and are LOUD to the point of distraction....Right up until they are a bare, poorly weathered carcass at less than 20k in mileage. They have never seen worth the price that they charge for them.

Cons: poor wear, lose grip, poor ride, compromised handling, loud
Mileage: 20000 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Comparisons
Show all

Activity feed

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake caliper Akebono has only 10 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake pads ARAGON has only 2 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake pads NIPPARTS got the first review!

The brake discs PILENGA got the first review!

The brake discs Hella Pagid has only 4 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The timing belt RIDEX got the first review!

For tires IRONMAN already 25 reviews.

For tires GISLAVED already 25 reviews.

In the rating best ignition coil already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!

In the rating best brake caliper already 8 brands participate!

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

In the auto rating brake discs for Volkswagen Golf already 10 brands participate!

In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating wiper blades for Ford Fusion already 10 brands participate!

The battery MOPAR has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The timing chain OEM Toyota has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The glow plug Autolite has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The engine radiator MISHIMOTO already has 300 votes!

The battery OEM Toyota already has 100 votes!

The brake pads OEM Subaru already has 250 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

Loading...