Tires Falken or Kumho

Filter

Part:

Tires
Back
  • loading...

Manufacturer:

All
Back
  • loading...

Make:

Select make
Back
  • loading...

Generation:

Select generation
  • Vectra
  • Mokka
  • Antara
  • Astra
  • SPORTS TOURER
  • Meriva
  • Zafira Tourer
Review tone
Reviews found: 0
Kumho Tires

The Kumho is a far superior tire from a respected manufacturer based in South Korea. The Radar might look like the better deal up front, but it will likely wear fast and not perform anywhere near as good as the Kumho tires.

Pros: superior tire, respected manufacturer
Cons: wears fast, poor performance
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Kumho Tires

I had those Kumhos on my mustang and found they were really good. No complaints about them. I highly recommend them especially for the price

Pros: really good, no complaints
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Kumho Tires

I'm in Vancouver where it constantly rains for half the year and I haven't noticed any issue with the stock Kumhos whether in the city or on the highway.

Even in the snow, I felt they performed fine driving at half the speed limit in the city.

Pros: performed fine in snow
Cons: none
Vehicle: Kia
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Kumho Tires
pate0018
Rating 4.0
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:

I got a set of Kuhmo's 2 years ago and I have no complaints. For the price I paid, I love them. They feel like the Michelin and Continental tires I have had previously, but I don't know if they will last as long.

Pros: great value, good quality
Cons: longevity unknown
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Falken Tires
Photog2985
Rating 5.0
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:

I've got the AT3W on my 4R with about 30k miles on them and I love them. They 275s in a C-load so they're HEAVY, but they're wearing great.

Pros: wearing great
Cons: heavy
Mileage: 30000 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Falken Tires

I’ve had my AT3’s for about 3 years now. I live in Arizona and drive in the desert a lot and occasionally rainy/snowy slush roads in the winter over never ever had a issue and the noise is minimal to me. Just overall a damn good tire.

Pros: damn good tire, minimal noise
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Falken Tires
DaikonProof6637
Rating 5.0
  • Grip:
  • Noise:

Wildpeaks over all the others. I have hundreds of thousands of miles experience with all three and the Falkens are by far the best in all conditions and remain consistent over the life of tread. The KOs will get louder and offer less traction the more miles you put on them, the Toyos, in my experience don't last that long at all. My WPs have stayed relatively quiet and continued to offer the same traction on/offroad throughout their life, I've also been getting roughly 70-80k miles out of them before even considering replacing them.

The downside to the Falkens is that they're very heavy compared to the others. I noticed a sizeable drop in MPG for sure.

Pros: best in all conditions
Cons: heavy, drop in MPG
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Kumho Tires

I heard Kumho don't last very long, but are good for the first 10,000 miles and not good at all by 30,000 miles.

Pros: good for first miles
Cons: don't last long
Vehicle: Ford Escape
Mileage: 10000 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Falken Tires
wombat917
Rating 1.0
  • Grip:
  • Noise:

2nd Gen not 5th but I replaced the ancient tires on my 4runner with wildpeaks and had them on for a few years. Hated them. Hated driving curves in the rain on pavement. Roundabouts would lose traction even in summer and as you know, these are NOT cars with a fast takeoff. They were quiet, I'll give them that.

Pros: quiet
Cons: hated driving curves, lose traction
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Falken Tires

I’ve got the Falken Wildpeaks on a 2008 F350 Dually and they’re ok on dry roads. I put them on all seven wheels 6 + the spare) in 2019 and do regular rotations. Today while pulling one to get a slow leak fixed I noticed substantial weather checking down between the lugs; it concerns me, even though it’s been 3.5 years I’m nowhere near the 50,000 miles tread wear warranty. I’ll add these tires really suck in any kind of slick mud and snow/ice on or off the road. Terrible on ice and snow.

Pros: ok on dry roads
Cons: suck in mud, snow, ice
Vehicle: Ford
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
1 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ... 135

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Comparisons
Show all

Activity feed

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake caliper Akebono has only 10 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake pads ARAGON has only 2 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake pads NIPPARTS got the first review!

The brake discs PILENGA got the first review!

The brake discs Hella Pagid has only 4 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The timing belt RIDEX got the first review!

For tires IRONMAN already 25 reviews.

For tires GISLAVED already 25 reviews.

In the rating best ignition coil already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!

In the rating best brake caliper already 8 brands participate!

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

In the auto rating brake discs for Volkswagen Golf already 10 brands participate!

In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating wiper blades for Ford Fusion already 10 brands participate!

The battery MOPAR has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The timing chain OEM Toyota has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The glow plug Autolite has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The engine radiator MISHIMOTO already has 300 votes!

The battery OEM Toyota already has 100 votes!

The brake pads OEM Subaru already has 250 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

Loading...