vs
Tires FEDERAL or DEBICA
Debica navigator 3. Sunt mai ok iarna fata de ce no nameuri \u00eemi puneam de \"iarna\"
Pros: mai ok iarna
Debica Frigo 2, puse pe un Peugeot 107, toate 4 noi, pret decent, chiar se descurca bine pe zapada in conditiile in care stilul meu de condus este unul plictisitor si previzibil, n-am nimic de demonstrat.
Pros: pret decent, se descurca bine
Vehicle:
Peugeot 107
Eu personal pentru all season iti pot recomanda Debica: am avut in trecut si sunt decente.
Pros: decente, recomandate
I ended up opting for Federal 595RS-RR their cheaper and i like how they perform
Pros: cheaper, good performance
Vehicle:
Mazda
I'm running 255/35R18 Federal 595RS-Pro and like them alot. Pretty affordable and nice level of grip.
Pros: affordable, nice grip
Vehicle:
Mazda
Am debica frigo 2, nu sunt rele, dar am mers cu mai bune. Pot spune că sunt fix de banii aia
Pros: fix de banii aia
Cons: am mers cu mai bune
Pneumatici invernali.
Beh, non necessariamente "costosi ", ma non lesinate sul prezzo per risparmiare magari 15/20€ a gomma.
Perché quando vi capita la neve seria sulla strada vi salvano la giornata.
Mi è capitato in Germania con delle gomme invernali di merda (debica) di fare un 270 in uscita da una rotonda presa piano con 2cm di neve.
Pros: salvano la giornata sulla neve
Cons: gomme invernali di merda
They seem to grip decent once warmed up, but they are a bit on the loud side.
Pros: grip decent
Cons: a bit loud
Cele mai proaste anvelope din via\u021ba mea au fost ni\u0219te Debica, intram foarte repede \u00een acvaplanare cu ele. A fost o u\u0219urare c\u00e2nd am sc\u0103pat de ele, de fiecare dat\u0103 c\u00e2nd era ud pe jos trebuia s\u0103 merg mai \u00eencet ca al\u021bii.
Cons: intram foarte repede \u00een acvaplanare
Schimb\u0103-le. Nu merit\u0103 s\u0103 \u00ee\u021bi ri\u0219ti via\u021ba ta \u0219i a celor din jur.
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads NIPPARTS got the first review!
The brake discs Hella got the first review!
The brake discs OEM Suzuki got the first review!
For tires OEM Toyota already 25 reviews.
For tires IRONMAN already 25 reviews.
For starter motor OEM Volkswagen already 25 reviews.
In the rating best ignition coil already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!
In the rating best turbocharger already 4 brands participate!
In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for BMW M2 already 5 brands participate!
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
Which tires to choose — FEDERAL or DEBICA?
If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare tires across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which tires are better — DEBICA or FEDERAL?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires FEDERAL were overall better than DEBICA.
- FEDERAL received a PR Score of 72 out of 100, and DEBICA scored 77 points.
- FEDERAL ranked 23 in the overall ranking, and DEBICA ranked 49.
- The average rating is higher for FEDERAL (3.7) than for DEBICA (3.5).
-
Tires FEDERAL have better feature ratings than DEBICA:
- Noise - owners believe, that this property for DEBICA is better than FEDERAL.
- Grip - drivers claim, that this property for FEDERAL is outperforms DEBICA.
- Ride comfort - reviews suggest, that this property for FEDERAL is preferred to DEBICA.
Which tires are more popular — FEDERAL or DEBICA?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires FEDERAL were overall more popular than DEBICA.
By vote balance, tires FEDERAL surpassed DEBICA:
- For FEDERAL, the ratio of positive (260) to negative (101) votes is 159 votes.
- For DEBICA, the ratio of positive (34) to negative (10) votes is 24 votes.
By number of reviews, tires FEDERAL surpassed DEBICA:
- For tires FEDERAL there are 112 reviews: 68 positive, 28 neutral, 15 negative.
- For tires DEBICA there are 14 reviews: 10 positive, 2 neutral, 2 negative.
Which tires do car owners prefer — FEDERAL or DEBICA?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires FEDERAL and DEBICA have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.
Other comparisons of tires
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of tires FEDERAL with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
Also available: comparisons of tires DEBICA with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.