vs
Tires IRONMAN or FULDA
I'm in ironman gen 2 from tire discounters all 4, i got all the tires and the mount and a alignment and balancing for like 400$ bucks with the deal they run. And a free oil change. But the ironmans have done me well they did good in rain and snow and i haven't exactly been nice to them, handled potholes too.
Pros: good in rain and snow
An ultra-high-performance all-season tire, the iMove Gen 3 A/S from Ironman is designed for use on sport and performance-oriented coupes and sedans. Built with large shoulders that improve cornering and handling, the iMove Gen 3 A/S features an all-season rubber compound that allows for solid traction in dry, wet, and light winter weather conditions.
Pros: solid traction, quiet ride
All season neki srednji segment je bolji od nizeg segmenta zimskih i letnjih. Npr Fulda all season je dobra.
Pros: srednji segment bolji
I thought they must be crap but after looking into them, they are very well-reviewed. A traction A temp, UHP (ultra-high performance) rated. I like them. You could pay $400/tire for a premium brand but they won't be 4 times better or last 4 times longer.
Pros: very well-reviewed, traction A temp, UHP rated, good value
I stretch 225/35/19 Ironman Gen 2s on 9.5 wides, they seem like they have more stretch to give too.
Pros: good stretch potential
Ironman and milemaker are the last two sets and they lasted about 75% of what a premium brand would.
Cons: shorter lifespan
I myself also have allseason, Fulda Multicontrol. So far in those conditions you described they perform allright, but you need to be careful. I’m still not fully convinced to take them to direct snow since I have tried to cross some purely snowy areas and they get stuck.
Pros: perform alright, need care
Cons: get stuck in snow
Ironman is a value line. They are not awful, also not outstanding. Wet traction and winter traction are not gonna be their strength.
Cons: poor wet, winter traction
This tire is new Iron Man. This is the second chunk missing; the other tire was replaced under warranty. It’s new, maybe 2 months old.
Cons: chunks missing, warranty replacement
Ironmans are garbage. Slipped in any kind of wet weather
Cons: slipped in wet weather
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads OEM Alfa Romeo got the first review!
The brake caliper OEM BMW got the first review!
The brake pads OEM Infiniti got the first review!
For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.
For battery Energizer already 25 reviews.
In the rating best water pump already 12 brands participate!
In the rating best timing belt already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!
In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating tires for Subaru Outback already 50 brands participate!
For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
Which tires to choose — IRONMAN or FULDA?
If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare tires across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which tires are better — FULDA or IRONMAN?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires FULDA were overall better than IRONMAN.
- IRONMAN received a PR Score of 66 out of 100, and FULDA scored 82 points.
- IRONMAN ranked 39 in the overall ranking, and FULDA ranked 43.
- The average rating is higher for FULDA (3.9) than for IRONMAN (3.2).
-
Tires FULDA have better feature ratings than IRONMAN:
- Noise - owners believe, that by this property IRONMAN does not differ from FULDA.
- Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for FULDA is outperforms IRONMAN.
- Grip - reviews suggest, that this property for FULDA is preferred to IRONMAN.
Which tires are more popular — IRONMAN or FULDA?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires FULDA were overall more popular than FULDA.
The brands are equal by vote balance:
- For IRONMAN, the ratio of positive (54) to negative (27) votes is 27 votes.
- For FULDA, the ratio of positive (34) to negative (7) votes is 27 votes.
By number of reviews, tires IRONMAN surpassed FULDA:
- For tires IRONMAN there are 25 reviews: 14 positive, 6 neutral, 5 negative.
- For tires FULDA there are 13 reviews: 10 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative.
Which tires do car owners prefer — IRONMAN or FULDA?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires IRONMAN and FULDA have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.
Other comparisons of tires
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of tires IRONMAN with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
Also available: comparisons of tires FULDA with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.