vs
Tires IRONMAN or GOODRIDGE
I'm in ironman gen 2 from tire discounters all 4, i got all the tires and the mount and a alignment and balancing for like 400$ bucks with the deal they run. And a free oil change. But the ironmans have done me well they did good in rain and snow and i haven't exactly been nice to them, handled potholes too.
Pros: good in rain and snow
An ultra-high-performance all-season tire, the iMove Gen 3 A/S from Ironman is designed for use on sport and performance-oriented coupes and sedans. Built with large shoulders that improve cornering and handling, the iMove Gen 3 A/S features an all-season rubber compound that allows for solid traction in dry, wet, and light winter weather conditions.
Pros: solid traction, quiet ride
Goodride padangos yra biudžetinės continental brando padangos. Važinėta ne viena sezona viskas su jomis gerai
Pros: everything fine, budget option
I thought they must be crap but after looking into them, they are very well-reviewed. A traction A temp, UHP (ultra-high performance) rated. I like them. You could pay $400/tire for a premium brand but they won't be 4 times better or last 4 times longer.
Pros: very well-reviewed, traction A temp, UHP rated, good value
Ironman and milemaker are the last two sets and they lasted about 75% of what a premium brand would.
Cons: shorter lifespan
Ironman is a value line. They are not awful, also not outstanding. Wet traction and winter traction are not gonna be their strength.
Cons: poor wet, winter traction
Goodride ZuperSnow lololol At this point I wouldn't be surprised if I saw knockoff linglongs called yingyong. Ride for happiness sensation. Let's smooth!
Cons: poor quality, cheap imitation, bad ride
This tire is new Iron Man. This is the second chunk missing; the other tire was replaced under warranty. It’s new, maybe 2 months old.
Cons: chunks missing, warranty replacement
turėjau Goodrode SW608 ant E320 merso universalo. pirmą žiemą atsikankinau ir paaukojau Ukrainos fronto automobiliams. jei Vilniuj kada matei praeitą žiemą į Tauro ar Šekinės kalną nepakylantį tamsiai mėlyną Mersą po nakties sniegučio, kai dar nebarstyta - tai buvau aš, keikiantis Goodride’us. o pasimoviau ant to, kad Continental grupės biudžetnikai, tipo, kainos kokybės santykis. nea, kokybės ten nedaug.
Cons: poor winter performance, low quality
Part number: SW608
Goodride ni slučajno. Uzela sam u 7.mj od vulkanizera goodride all season gume koje je netko vozio pola godine prije mene. Katastrofa.
Cons: katastrofa
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads NIPPARTS got the first review!
The brake discs Hella got the first review!
The brake discs OEM Suzuki got the first review!
For tires OEM Toyota already 25 reviews.
For tires IRONMAN already 25 reviews.
For starter motor OEM Volkswagen already 25 reviews.
In the rating best ignition coil already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!
In the rating best turbocharger already 4 brands participate!
In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for BMW M2 already 5 brands participate!
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
Which tires to choose — IRONMAN or GOODRIDGE?
If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare tires across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which tires are better — GOODRIDGE or IRONMAN?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires IRONMAN were overall better than GOODRIDGE.
- IRONMAN received a PR Score of 66 out of 100, and GOODRIDGE scored 32 points.
- IRONMAN ranked 39 in the overall ranking, and GOODRIDGE ranked 65.
- The average rating is higher for IRONMAN (3.2) than for GOODRIDGE (2.2).
-
Tires IRONMAN have better feature ratings than GOODRIDGE:
- Noise - owners believe, that this property for GOODRIDGE is better than IRONMAN.
- Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for GOODRIDGE is outperforms IRONMAN.
- Grip - reviews suggest, that this property for IRONMAN is preferred to GOODRIDGE.
Which tires are more popular — IRONMAN or GOODRIDGE?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires IRONMAN were overall more popular than GOODRIDGE.
By vote balance, tires IRONMAN surpassed GOODRIDGE:
- For IRONMAN, the ratio of positive (54) to negative (27) votes is 27 votes.
- For GOODRIDGE, the ratio of positive (16) to negative (34) votes is -18 votes.
By number of reviews, tires IRONMAN surpassed GOODRIDGE:
- For tires IRONMAN there are 25 reviews: 14 positive, 6 neutral, 5 negative.
- For tires GOODRIDGE there are 16 reviews: 4 positive, 2 neutral, 10 negative.
Which tires do car owners prefer — IRONMAN or GOODRIDGE?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires IRONMAN and GOODRIDGE have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.
Other comparisons of tires
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of tires IRONMAN with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
Also available: comparisons of tires GOODRIDGE with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.