vs
Tires IRONMAN or Triangle
I'm in ironman gen 2 from tire discounters all 4, i got all the tires and the mount and a alignment and balancing for like 400$ bucks with the deal they run. And a free oil change. But the ironmans have done me well they did good in rain and snow and i haven't exactly been nice to them, handled potholes too.
Pros: good in rain and snow
Imk kinus ir nesuk galvos. Pats su 330i su triangle kazkokiais važiavau, buvo labai gerai, geriau nei su naudotais nokianais. Kabliukas tame, kad antrą žiemą kur kas prasčiau kibo, trečią visai akmeninės. Tai kinus perki vieniem metam.
Pros: labai gerai, geriau nei
Cons: antra žiemą prasčiau kibo
Vehicle:
BMW
An ultra-high-performance all-season tire, the iMove Gen 3 A/S from Ironman is designed for use on sport and performance-oriented coupes and sedans. Built with large shoulders that improve cornering and handling, the iMove Gen 3 A/S features an all-season rubber compound that allows for solid traction in dry, wet, and light winter weather conditions.
Pros: solid traction, quiet ride
I have driven a lot on Triangle winter tyres at work for 2 years. They were as good or better than the Continental and Nokian tyres from the years before.
Pros: good performance, comparable to premium brands
Ironman and milemaker are the last two sets and they lasted about 75% of what a premium brand would.
Cons: shorter lifespan
Ironman is a value line. They are not awful, also not outstanding. Wet traction and winter traction are not gonna be their strength.
Cons: poor wet, winter traction
Money forced my hand a couple summers back and I had to put new front tires on my Grand Marquis at the time. Had to go cheap and bought Ironman iMove all seasons. After a few months the only positives on the ledger were that a) they had tread and b) oddly, they balanced out unbelievably well. 80 MPH on the highway, smooth as glass. Ride and handling quality deteriorated quickly from new and they got loud in a hurry.
Pros: balanced well, smooth at speed
Cons: deteriorated quickly, got loud
Poteva andare peggio: potevi aver preso delle Triangle AdvanteX TC101...
This tire is new Iron Man. This is the second chunk missing; the other tire was replaced under warranty. It’s new, maybe 2 months old.
Cons: chunks missing, warranty replacement
Triangle tires tend to be very bumpy at low speeds.
Cons: bumpy at low speeds
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads OEM Alfa Romeo got the first review!
The brake caliper OEM BMW got the first review!
The brake pads OEM Infiniti got the first review!
For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.
For battery Energizer already 25 reviews.
In the rating best water pump already 12 brands participate!
In the rating best timing belt already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!
In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating tires for Subaru Outback already 50 brands participate!
For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
Which tires to choose — IRONMAN or Triangle?
If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare tires across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which tires are better — Triangle or IRONMAN?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires IRONMAN were overall better than Triangle.
- IRONMAN received a PR Score of 66 out of 100, and Triangle scored 59 points.
- IRONMAN ranked 39 in the overall ranking, and Triangle ranked 51.
- The average rating is higher for IRONMAN (3.2) than for Triangle (3.1).
-
Tires IRONMAN have better feature ratings than Triangle:
- Noise - owners believe, that this property for IRONMAN is better than Triangle.
- Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for IRONMAN is outperforms Triangle.
- Grip - reviews suggest, that this property for Triangle is preferred to IRONMAN.
Which tires are more popular — IRONMAN or Triangle?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires IRONMAN were overall more popular than Triangle.
By vote balance, tires IRONMAN surpassed Triangle:
- For IRONMAN, the ratio of positive (54) to negative (27) votes is 27 votes.
- For Triangle, the ratio of positive (19) to negative (13) votes is 6 votes.
By number of reviews, tires IRONMAN surpassed Triangle:
- For tires IRONMAN there are 25 reviews: 14 positive, 6 neutral, 5 negative.
- For tires Triangle there are 10 reviews: 5 positive, 2 neutral, 3 negative.
Which tires do car owners prefer — IRONMAN or Triangle?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires IRONMAN and Triangle have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.
Other comparisons of tires
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of tires IRONMAN with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
Also available: comparisons of tires Triangle with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.