vs
Tires Laufenn or DEBICA
I am using laufen s fit as on my 2023 MY dual.. it cost me 108usd per /tire got it at AMERICAS TIRE. I agree woth others on foam padding but i am least bothered bout it. Performace wise i see no difference in regular day to day driving. Infact have performed well in snow as well.. i am happy with it running almost 2k miles till now.
Pros: performed well in snow
Cons: foam padding bothered
Mileage: 3218 km
I've been running a set of the latter AS in the snow and they've been great for an AS considering the conditions.
Pros: great in snow, affordable quality
Check out Laufenn for tire options. They are Hankook’s economy line, and they are solid tires at an affordable price.
Pros: solid tires, affordable price
Laufenn is well regarded as a practical option.
Pros: well regarded, practical
America’s tire has Laufenn s fit all season tires with 45k mile warranty for ~$700 installed. Or kumho solus majesty 9s for ~$775.
Pros: 45k mile warranty
Laufenn S fit AS is not bad, it is a hankook company and usually 1/3 the price of Pirelli with very similar performance.
Pros: similar performance
Cons: not bad
Am avut 8 ani anvelope de iarna, 0 zapada, ba chiar 20g cu plus, dar am trecut la allseason si numai ninsoare si -5 grade prin Iasi.\n\nPe flescaraie la -5 grade am testat fara probleme \n\nPe zapada curata mers cu 20kmph fara probleme.\n\nPe zapada cu gheata dedesubt, 0 aderenta, doar drift.\n\nAnvelope Laufen 4Gfit
Pros: testat fara probleme
Cons: 0 aderenta pe zapada cu gheata
I just put on some Laufenn G Fit tires in August that I got for quietness but get poor wet weather ratings from *some* reviewers. I tested them in slop and could only activate ABS with a very hard stomp or traction control on a painted line.
Pros: quietness
Cons: poor wet weather ratings
Vehicle:
Honda Fit
Laufenn provides far less grip, especially when wet.
Cons: less grip, especially wet
Laufenn sam imao isto i hoce da proklizaju na ledu.
Cons: proklizaju na ledu
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads OEM Alfa Romeo got the first review!
The brake caliper OEM BMW got the first review!
The brake pads OEM Infiniti got the first review!
For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.
For battery Energizer already 25 reviews.
In the rating best water pump already 12 brands participate!
In the rating best timing belt already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!
In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating tires for Subaru Outback already 50 brands participate!
For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
Which tires to choose — Laufenn or DEBICA?
If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare tires across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which tires are better — DEBICA or Laufenn?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Laufenn were overall better than DEBICA.
- Laufenn received a PR Score of 69 out of 100, and DEBICA scored 77 points.
- Laufenn ranked 28 in the overall ranking, and DEBICA ranked 49.
- The average rating is higher for Laufenn (3.6) than for DEBICA (3.5).
-
Tires Laufenn have better feature ratings than DEBICA:
- Grip - owners believe, that this property for Laufenn is better than DEBICA.
- Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for Laufenn is outperforms DEBICA.
- Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for DEBICA is preferred to Laufenn.
Which tires are more popular — Laufenn or DEBICA?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Laufenn were overall more popular than DEBICA.
By vote balance, tires Laufenn surpassed DEBICA:
- For Laufenn, the ratio of positive (195) to negative (84) votes is 111 votes.
- For DEBICA, the ratio of positive (34) to negative (10) votes is 24 votes.
By number of reviews, tires Laufenn surpassed DEBICA:
- For tires Laufenn there are 86 reviews: 51 positive, 21 neutral, 14 negative.
- For tires DEBICA there are 14 reviews: 10 positive, 2 neutral, 2 negative.
Which tires do car owners prefer — Laufenn or DEBICA?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires Laufenn and DEBICA have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.
Other comparisons of tires
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of tires Laufenn with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
Also available: comparisons of tires DEBICA with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.