vs
Tires Laufenn or IRONMAN
I am using laufen s fit as on my 2023 MY dual.. it cost me 108usd per /tire got it at AMERICAS TIRE. I agree woth others on foam padding but i am least bothered bout it. Performace wise i see no difference in regular day to day driving. Infact have performed well in snow as well.. i am happy with it running almost 2k miles till now.
Pros: performed well in snow
Cons: foam padding bothered
Mileage: 3218 km
I've been running a set of the latter AS in the snow and they've been great for an AS considering the conditions.
Pros: great in snow, affordable quality
Check out Laufenn for tire options. They are Hankook’s economy line, and they are solid tires at an affordable price.
Pros: solid tires, affordable price
Laufenn is well regarded as a practical option.
Pros: well regarded, practical
I'm in ironman gen 2 from tire discounters all 4, i got all the tires and the mount and a alignment and balancing for like 400$ bucks with the deal they run. And a free oil change. But the ironmans have done me well they did good in rain and snow and i haven't exactly been nice to them, handled potholes too.
Pros: good in rain and snow
Laufenn S fit AS is not bad, it is a hankook company and usually 1/3 the price of Pirelli with very similar performance.
Pros: similar performance
Cons: not bad
Ironman and milemaker are the last two sets and they lasted about 75% of what a premium brand would.
Cons: shorter lifespan
Am avut 8 ani anvelope de iarna, 0 zapada, ba chiar 20g cu plus, dar am trecut la allseason si numai ninsoare si -5 grade prin Iasi.\n\nPe flescaraie la -5 grade am testat fara probleme \n\nPe zapada curata mers cu 20kmph fara probleme.\n\nPe zapada cu gheata dedesubt, 0 aderenta, doar drift.\n\nAnvelope Laufen 4Gfit
Pros: testat fara probleme
Cons: 0 aderenta pe zapada cu gheata
Laufenn provides far less grip, especially when wet.
Cons: less grip, especially wet
Laufenn sam imao isto i hoce da proklizaju na ledu.
Cons: proklizaju na ledu
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads OEM Alfa Romeo got the first review!
The brake caliper OEM BMW got the first review!
The brake pads OEM Infiniti got the first review!
For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.
For battery Energizer already 25 reviews.
In the rating best water pump already 12 brands participate!
In the rating best timing belt already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!
In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating tires for Subaru Outback already 50 brands participate!
For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
Which tires to choose — Laufenn or IRONMAN?
If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare tires across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which tires are better — IRONMAN or Laufenn?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Laufenn were overall better than IRONMAN.
- Laufenn received a PR Score of 69 out of 100, and IRONMAN scored 66 points.
- Laufenn ranked 28 in the overall ranking, and IRONMAN ranked 39.
- The average rating is higher for Laufenn (3.6) than for IRONMAN (3.2).
-
Tires Laufenn have better feature ratings than IRONMAN:
- Grip - owners believe, that this property for Laufenn is better than IRONMAN.
- Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for Laufenn is outperforms IRONMAN.
- Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for Laufenn is preferred to IRONMAN.
Which tires are more popular — Laufenn or IRONMAN?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Laufenn were overall more popular than IRONMAN.
By vote balance, tires Laufenn surpassed IRONMAN:
- For Laufenn, the ratio of positive (195) to negative (84) votes is 111 votes.
- For IRONMAN, the ratio of positive (54) to negative (27) votes is 27 votes.
By number of reviews, tires Laufenn surpassed IRONMAN:
- For tires Laufenn there are 86 reviews: 51 positive, 21 neutral, 14 negative.
- For tires IRONMAN there are 25 reviews: 14 positive, 6 neutral, 5 negative.
Which tires do car owners prefer — Laufenn or IRONMAN?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires Laufenn and IRONMAN have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.
Other comparisons of tires
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of tires Laufenn with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
Also available: comparisons of tires IRONMAN with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.