I put them on a Model 3 and to me I don't feel like there's anything the CC2's can do significantly better that would justify being 40% more expensive than the WRG5's.
the new set of Nokian Hakkapeliitta winter tires turned it into quite the beast in the snow and ice. I'm usually on the roads early before the plow and haven't gotten stuck or felt I couldn't continue because of the conditions.
Hey I know this thread is old, but I just discovered Hakkapeliittas and I'm planning to get those for next winter (start saving now). Just wondering is it still good without the studs? I live in Calgary Alberta.
I replace the Michelin at 20K (completely bald and dead) with Nokian Tyres One and have no complaints. They actually netted me better wh/mi by 10 wh/mi and is rated for 80k wear. How long that will last on a Tesla is yet to be seen. So far 5K in it 's still at 95% which compare to the Michelin would of been at 75%
The Subaru left the dealership with Nokian Outpost APT tires on it . These tires can be left on all year and meet DOT specs for winter use. Anyway, I've been driving on Nokian All Weather tires for about 20 years now on different cars for a total of 300,000 to 400,000 Km in all kinds of weather and they performed exceptionally well. The advantage is you always have the right tires no matter what the weather.
Aiemmin ajanut random nastoilla, mutta Nokia Hakkapelitta R5 kitkat tuli hankittua kun sähköautoon vaihdoin pari vuotta sitten enkä kyllä muita talvirenkaita enää huolisi. Menee säässä kun säässä eikä kertaakaan ole tarvinnut jännittää että pääseekö perille.
Syksyllä hankin etuvetoiseen autoon Nordman 9 -nastarenkaat, ja hyvin ovat pitäneet kovemmillakin vauhdeilla ja erittäin liukkailla keleillä. On testattu toimivaksi sekä Etelä-Suomessa että Pohjois-Norjan vuoristossa.
Mulla ollut Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 ja R4 kitkat suht tehokkaiden nelikkojen alla ja ollut tyytyväinen. Käyttäytyy miten pitääkin, aika löysät plussakelillä verrattuna venäläisiin kitkoihin (Viatti Brina), muuten ei moitteita.
The Nokian One Tires are marked as a low rolling resistance tire and I decided to give them a try. I drove a 14 mile loop with my old Michelin MXM4's at 35 MPH and then drove the same loop with the new Nokian One's. The Nokian tires had about 13% higher Watt-Hour per Mile consumption.
I had a set of Ones on my Civic for a short period but swapped them to Continental True Contact Tour 54 instead as they had some very weird vibration and wandering issues.
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake discs FEBI got the first review!
The power steering pump OEM Volvo got the first review!
The brake pads OEM Infiniti got the first review!
In the rating best shock absorbers already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!
In the rating best windshield already 14 brands participate!
In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating battery for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
For headlights OEM Volkswagen already 50 reviews.
For brake caliper OEM Volkswagen already 25 reviews.
For tires GISLAVED already 25 reviews.
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
