Tires Nokia or NANKANG

Filter

Part:

Tires
Back
  • loading...

Manufacturer:

All
Back
  • loading...

Make:

Select make
Back
  • loading...

Generation:

Select generation
  • Vectra
  • Mokka
  • Antara
  • Astra
  • SPORTS TOURER
  • Meriva
  • Zafira Tourer
Review tone
Reviews found: 0
NANKANG Tires

I'm running Girordisc in the front with IS3500 and in the rear stock rotors with IS3000 and they are holding up so far at Mosport with Nankang CRS V2 tires.

Pros: holding up so far
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Nokia Tires

I had them on an 2015 Accord sedan for four+ years(7/8 months per year), fantastic tires unfortunately I cannot attest to snow as I switch over to Hakkapeliitta 9 in Mid November as we have a Winter Tire Law in Quebec Canada. They are very good on the wet, great on dry, not particularly loud and wear relatively well but tire pressure and one good alignment a year is a must in Montreal with the fluctuations in Temperature and pot holes in the spring/summer...

Pros: very good on wet, great on dry
Cons: alignment a must
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Nokia Tires
Adept-Sky-1715
Rating 4.0
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:

My wife wanted a tire that was more comfortable, quieter, and had better treadwear than the OEM summer tires. So far, we're really happy with these tires.

Even though there's no acoustic foam like on our OEM tires, they're quieter. They're practically silent up to 50mph but there's a slight hum at freeway speeds. They're not as loud as the OEM Continentals.

They're also much more comfortable than the OEM summer tires. With the Ohlins suspension and OEM Continentals, the Polestar 2 was surprisingly jarring over small bumps on the road. One thing that I noticed was that the Nokian sidewalls seem to be pretty soft/flexible.

Tread life should be solid. Handling/Performance feels like 85% of the OEM tires.

All in all, these aren't track tires. Nor are they the sportiest tires in the UHP All-Season class. But they're a super practical choice for a wide range of coupes and sedans - they should wear well, they're comfortable, and provide enough grip to have fun.

Pros: quieter, more comfortable, good grip
Cons: softer and more vague
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Nokia Tires

I'm proud I bought Nokian winter tires few years ago. They weren't that expensive, about €75 each considering Continental were something like €120 each.

Pros: good price
Cons: Continental more expensive
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Nokia Tires

I put them on a Model 3 and to me I don't feel like there's anything the CC2's can do significantly better that would justify being 40% more expensive than the WRG5's.

Pros: good tire, averages well
Cons: tradeoffs with other tires
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Nokia Tires

the new set of Nokian Hakkapeliitta winter tires turned it into quite the beast in the snow and ice. I'm usually on the roads early before the plow and haven't gotten stuck or felt I couldn't continue because of the conditions.

Pros: excellent in snow and ice, never stuck
Vehicle: Ford Escape
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
NANKANG Tires
Jyrgo
Rating 4.0
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:

I myself drive Nankang AS2+ with the dimensions: 235/35 R19.

Apart from the less direct steering and a driving profile that is a little more geared towards comfort, I am very satisfied.

I have a great grip feeling and the rim protection is slightly wider than with the nexen nfera su1.

Pros: great grip feeling
Cons: less direct steering
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Nokia Tires
nicholism007
Rating 3.0
  • Grip:
  • Noise:

I run wrg4’s for winters and their decent. They’re not loud and they’re fine in the dry and wet. Snow and ice they could better. Not as good as a full winter but better than all seasons.

Pros: fine in dry and wet
Cons: could be better snow/ice
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Nokia Tires

Got mine a few weeks ago. Can't say I'm crazy about them. I drive a Prius Prime. On stock tires I got about 95+mpg(summer) on my 120mi daily commute. When I got G4, I was getting ~85mpg(summer). When I got G5, it dropped to about 75mpg(now). With just the gas engine, I got about 55mpg on stock tires, ~49 on G4, and something like ~45mpg or a bit higher on G5. I know new tires are generally more draggy. But this kind of number is still concerning, even though G5 has certified low rolling resistance and G4 didn't

Pros: low rolling resistance
Cons: decreased MPG
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
1 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 ... 86

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Comparisons
Show all

Activity feed

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake caliper ATE has only 9 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake fluid OEM Subaru has only 2 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake discs OEM Subaru has only 8 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake discs FEBI got the first review!

In the rating best shock absorbers already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!

In the rating best windshield already 14 brands participate!

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating battery for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!

The roof rack YAKIMA has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The brake pads G-brake has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The piston rings OEM Honda has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The engine radiator MISHIMOTO already has 300 votes!

The engine oil AMSOIL already has 1000 votes!

For tires GISLAVED already 25 reviews.

The tires OEM FORD already has 100 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

Loading...