vs
Tires PHANTOM or DEBICA
Debica navigator 3. Sunt mai ok iarna fata de ce no nameuri \u00eemi puneam de \"iarna\"
Pros: mai ok iarna
Debica Frigo 2, puse pe un Peugeot 107, toate 4 noi, pret decent, chiar se descurca bine pe zapada in conditiile in care stilul meu de condus este unul plictisitor si previzibil, n-am nimic de demonstrat.
Pros: pret decent, se descurca bine
Vehicle:
Peugeot 107
Eu personal pentru all season iti pot recomanda Debica: am avut in trecut si sunt decente.
Pros: decente, recomandate
Zic din experienta personala: niste cauciucuri de iarna Debica vs Michellin CrossClimate 2, prefer Debica de iarna.
Pros: prefer Debica de iarna
Am debica frigo 2, nu sunt rele, dar am mers cu mai bune. Pot spune că sunt fix de banii aia
Pros: fix de banii aia
Cons: am mers cu mai bune
Sure, for about 12k miles.
Pros: last 12k miles
Mileage: 19312 km
Some tires are made in China and some possibly(?) better ones are made Vietnam, while made in Korea tires usually aren't bad, but may not last as long as expensive tires. For safety, I wouldn't go too cheap on tires. Many cheap tires have rather poor traction when new and become unsafe with only a few miles of wear on them. The Chinese tires often are made of very hard rubber, which might wear well, but has poor traction. There may be some in between tires made in the Philippines, but I'd avoid them. Kumho is a Korean tire company with majority Chinese ownership by a Chinese tire company. They make Phantom tires, likely in China, but even in Korea, they would be the low end. Hankook tires are "better" Korean tires. Not the best, but seem safer. I'd check tire reviews on the Internet.
Pros: may wear well (hard rubber)
Cons: poor traction, not safe, avoid cheap
They’re good for me since my car has camber and will just destroy the tires anyways
Pros: good for camber wear
Cele mai proaste anvelope din via\u021ba mea au fost ni\u0219te Debica, intram foarte repede \u00een acvaplanare cu ele. A fost o u\u0219urare c\u00e2nd am sc\u0103pat de ele, de fiecare dat\u0103 c\u00e2nd era ud pe jos trebuia s\u0103 merg mai \u00eencet ca al\u021bii.
Cons: intram foarte repede \u00een acvaplanare
Schimb\u0103-le. Nu merit\u0103 s\u0103 \u00ee\u021bi ri\u0219ti via\u021ba ta \u0219i a celor din jur.
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads OEM Alfa Romeo got the first review!
The brake caliper OEM BMW got the first review!
The brake pads OEM Infiniti got the first review!
For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.
For battery Energizer already 25 reviews.
In the rating best water pump already 12 brands participate!
In the rating best timing belt already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!
In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating tires for Subaru Outback already 50 brands participate!
For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
Which tires to choose — PHANTOM or DEBICA?
If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare tires across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which tires are better — DEBICA or PHANTOM?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires DEBICA were overall better than PHANTOM.
- PHANTOM received a PR Score of 46 out of 100, and DEBICA scored 77 points.
- PHANTOM ranked 58 in the overall ranking, and DEBICA ranked 49.
- The average rating is higher for DEBICA (3.5) than for PHANTOM (2.9).
-
Tires DEBICA have better feature ratings than PHANTOM:
- Grip - owners believe, that this property for DEBICA is better than PHANTOM.
- Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for PHANTOM is outperforms DEBICA.
- Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for DEBICA is preferred to PHANTOM.
Which tires are more popular — PHANTOM or DEBICA?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires DEBICA were overall more popular than PHANTOM.
By vote balance, tires DEBICA surpassed PHANTOM:
- For PHANTOM, the ratio of positive (20) to negative (23) votes is -3 votes.
- For DEBICA, the ratio of positive (34) to negative (10) votes is 24 votes.
By number of reviews, tires DEBICA surpassed PHANTOM:
- For tires PHANTOM there are 12 reviews: 2 positive, 7 neutral, 3 negative.
- For tires DEBICA there are 14 reviews: 10 positive, 2 neutral, 2 negative.
Which tires do car owners prefer — PHANTOM or DEBICA?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires PHANTOM and DEBICA have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.
Other comparisons of tires
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of tires PHANTOM with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
Also available: comparisons of tires DEBICA with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.