vs
Tires PHANTOM or FULDA
All season neki srednji segment je bolji od nizeg segmenta zimskih i letnjih. Npr Fulda all season je dobra.
Pros: srednji segment bolji
Imam Fulda celoletne in so ok, sedaj 2 leti. Ne vozim na limitu tako da ne vidim neke bistvene razlike
Pros: ok, no big difference
I have 215/40R17 fulda sport control 2 on my 320i coupe on replica alpina wheels, i dont know the sizes.. but combined with bilstein b12 coilovers and z3M steering rack its like a go kart
Pros: like a go kart
Vehicle:
BMW
Currently, running Phantom C-sports. Have 25k on these...and they are wearing o0n target to reach the 50k guarantee.
Pros: wearing on target
Cons: EV tires are a scam
Vehicle:
Kia
Mileage: 40200 km
I myself also have allseason, Fulda Multicontrol. So far in those conditions you described they perform allright, but you need to be careful. I’m still not fully convinced to take them to direct snow since I have tried to cross some purely snowy areas and they get stuck.
Pros: perform alright, need care
Cons: get stuck in snow
Sure, for about 12k miles.
Pros: last 12k miles
Mileage: 19312 km
Some tires are made in China and some possibly(?) better ones are made Vietnam, while made in Korea tires usually aren't bad, but may not last as long as expensive tires. For safety, I wouldn't go too cheap on tires. Many cheap tires have rather poor traction when new and become unsafe with only a few miles of wear on them. The Chinese tires often are made of very hard rubber, which might wear well, but has poor traction. There may be some in between tires made in the Philippines, but I'd avoid them. Kumho is a Korean tire company with majority Chinese ownership by a Chinese tire company. They make Phantom tires, likely in China, but even in Korea, they would be the low end. Hankook tires are "better" Korean tires. Not the best, but seem safer. I'd check tire reviews on the Internet.
Pros: may wear well (hard rubber)
Cons: poor traction, not safe, avoid cheap
They’re good for me since my car has camber and will just destroy the tires anyways
Pros: good for camber wear
They're Chinese junk. They sorta work, but have 20% less traction and 50% less lifetime.
Pros: sorta work
Cons: less traction, less lifetime
this winter my Fulda winter tires drove me nuts when they developed some stupid humming noise. Not to mention a friend of a friend had the same Fuldas and chunks of the tread just blew apart.
Pros: null
Cons: humming noise, tread blew
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads OEM Alfa Romeo got the first review!
The brake caliper OEM BMW got the first review!
The brake pads OEM Infiniti got the first review!
For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.
For battery Energizer already 25 reviews.
In the rating best water pump already 12 brands participate!
In the rating best timing belt already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!
In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating tires for Subaru Outback already 50 brands participate!
For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
Which tires to choose — PHANTOM or FULDA?
If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare tires across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which tires are better — FULDA or PHANTOM?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires FULDA were overall better than PHANTOM.
- PHANTOM received a PR Score of 46 out of 100, and FULDA scored 82 points.
- PHANTOM ranked 58 in the overall ranking, and FULDA ranked 43.
- The average rating is higher for FULDA (3.9) than for PHANTOM (2.9).
-
Tires FULDA have better feature ratings than PHANTOM:
- Grip - owners believe, that this property for FULDA is better than PHANTOM.
- Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for FULDA is outperforms PHANTOM.
- Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for PHANTOM is preferred to FULDA.
Which tires are more popular — PHANTOM or FULDA?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires FULDA were overall more popular than PHANTOM.
By vote balance, tires FULDA surpassed PHANTOM:
- For PHANTOM, the ratio of positive (20) to negative (23) votes is -3 votes.
- For FULDA, the ratio of positive (34) to negative (7) votes is 27 votes.
By number of reviews, tires FULDA surpassed PHANTOM:
- For tires PHANTOM there are 12 reviews: 2 positive, 7 neutral, 3 negative.
- For tires FULDA there are 13 reviews: 10 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative.
Which tires do car owners prefer — PHANTOM or FULDA?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires PHANTOM and FULDA have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.
Other comparisons of tires
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of tires PHANTOM with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
Also available: comparisons of tires FULDA with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.