vs
Tires RIKEN or FULDA
Tires like the Riken Raptor are a soft tire and performance minded, but not full on track tire (300tw). They perform quite well, but at the same time, are dirt cheap.
Pros: perform quite well
Cons: not full on track
Vehicle:
Mazda
In my experience the best bang for your buck summer tire is the Riken Raptor. They're about $100 a pop and have great dry grip. Downside is that they're not amazing in very wet conditions.
Pros: great dry grip
Cons: not amazing in wet
Vehicle:
Volkswagen Golf
Riken Raptor ZR A/S RF. These tires were under $400 for a SET (about $86 per tire). 300tw. Aggressive tire pattern. And they are a solid performer for canyon carving. I drove them about 4000 miles over a week this past summer around MATG including some pretty aggressive backroad driving and they held up VERY well. Insanely well given the price.
Pros: solid performer, aggressive pattern
Cons: grip suffers a bit
Mileage: 4000 km
All season neki srednji segment je bolji od nizeg segmenta zimskih i letnjih. Npr Fulda all season je dobra.
Pros: srednji segment bolji
Imam Fulda celoletne in so ok, sedaj 2 leti. Ne vozim na limitu tako da ne vidim neke bistvene razlike
Pros: ok, no big difference
I myself also have allseason, Fulda Multicontrol. So far in those conditions you described they perform allright, but you need to be careful. I’m still not fully convinced to take them to direct snow since I have tried to cross some purely snowy areas and they get stuck.
Pros: perform alright, need care
Cons: get stuck in snow
Eu am Riken Snow pe mașina de la lucru, pe uscat zici că e pe șine, nu zice pâs dar pe ud am niște emoții de nu-i adevărat ???? nu doar odată era să fac piruete cu ea la viteze de nimic și stai că astea-s bune că am avut pe masina de la lucru inainte un set blanao de viatti brina, dădeam scârb 1-2-3 pe ud cu 1.4 aspirat, babaiatule...
Pros: pe uscat zici ca e pe sine
Cons: emotii pe ud
Vehicle:
Suzuki Vitara
I have some rikens as my non-race tires for the c4. They're fine.
Pros: fine performance
Vehicle:
Chevrolet Corvette C4
Uzeo sam pre 2 godine all season riken i za prvih godinu dana nisam primetio nista lose, medjutim od skoro su pocele da se ponasaju dosta lose, drze krivinu solidno dobro ali na gas i kocnicu proklizavaju bas dosta
Pros: drze krivinu solidno dobro
Cons: proklizavaju bas dosta
this winter my Fulda winter tires drove me nuts when they developed some stupid humming noise. Not to mention a friend of a friend had the same Fuldas and chunks of the tread just blew apart.
Pros: null
Cons: humming noise, tread blew
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads OEM Alfa Romeo got the first review!
The brake caliper OEM BMW got the first review!
The brake pads OEM Infiniti got the first review!
For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.
For battery Energizer already 25 reviews.
In the rating best water pump already 12 brands participate!
In the rating best timing belt already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!
In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating tires for Subaru Outback already 50 brands participate!
For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
Which tires to choose — RIKEN or FULDA?
If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare tires across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which tires are better — FULDA or RIKEN?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires FULDA were overall better than RIKEN.
- RIKEN received a PR Score of 71 out of 100, and FULDA scored 82 points.
- RIKEN ranked 55 in the overall ranking, and FULDA ranked 43.
- The average rating is higher for FULDA (3.9) than for RIKEN (3.6).
-
Tires FULDA have better feature ratings than RIKEN:
- Ride comfort - owners believe, that by this property RIKEN does not differ from FULDA.
- Noise - drivers claim, that this property for RIKEN is outperforms FULDA.
- Grip - reviews suggest, that by this property RIKEN does not differ from FULDA.
Which tires are more popular — RIKEN or FULDA?
Tires RIKEN and FULDA were equally popular according to data in March 2026.
By vote balance, tires FULDA surpassed RIKEN:
- For RIKEN, the ratio of positive (35) to negative (14) votes is 21 vote.
- For FULDA, the ratio of positive (34) to negative (7) votes is 27 votes.
By number of reviews, tires RIKEN surpassed FULDA:
- For tires RIKEN there are 15 reviews: 9 positive, 4 neutral, 2 negative.
- For tires FULDA there are 13 reviews: 10 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative.
Which tires do car owners prefer — RIKEN or FULDA?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires RIKEN and FULDA have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.
Other comparisons of tires
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of tires RIKEN with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
Also available: comparisons of tires FULDA with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.