vs
Tires Sava or PHANTOM
Sava zimska guma, Mazda CX3, prošao sam svim neočišćenim ulicama metropole ćacistana, uzbrdo, po ravnom i nizbrdo, bez ikakvih problema. Samo polako i paželjivo
Pros: bez ikakvih problema
Vehicle:
Mazda
Zimske sava sve 4 na starom malom krsu, ide ko zmaj
Pros: ide ko zmaj
Najobičnije zimske Sava gume (nove doduše), prednji pogon, konzervativno korištenje kočnice i sve top!
Pros: konzervativno korištenje kočnice
The Sava is a good tire, gets good test results especially in winter condition.
Pros: good test results
Za zimske uzmi npr. Savu eskimo, koja je oduvijek genijalna.
Pros: oduvijek genijalna
Sure, for about 12k miles.
Pros: last 12k miles
Mileage: 19312 km
Some tires are made in China and some possibly(?) better ones are made Vietnam, while made in Korea tires usually aren't bad, but may not last as long as expensive tires. For safety, I wouldn't go too cheap on tires. Many cheap tires have rather poor traction when new and become unsafe with only a few miles of wear on them. The Chinese tires often are made of very hard rubber, which might wear well, but has poor traction. There may be some in between tires made in the Philippines, but I'd avoid them. Kumho is a Korean tire company with majority Chinese ownership by a Chinese tire company. They make Phantom tires, likely in China, but even in Korea, they would be the low end. Hankook tires are "better" Korean tires. Not the best, but seem safer. I'd check tire reviews on the Internet.
Pros: may wear well (hard rubber)
Cons: poor traction, not safe, avoid cheap
They’re good for me since my car has camber and will just destroy the tires anyways
Pros: good for camber wear
I'm aware these are crap, and chunking as fuck, and that they are old and a budget brand called Sava. I won't use them, cause I'm a scraddycat and don't want to risk my ass, car or family for a pair of tires, which in the long run is not that much of money in Eustern Europe where I'm at.
Cons: crap quality, chunking, old
They're Chinese junk. They sorta work, but have 20% less traction and 50% less lifetime.
Pros: sorta work
Cons: less traction, less lifetime
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads OEM Alfa Romeo got the first review!
The brake caliper OEM BMW got the first review!
The brake pads OEM Infiniti got the first review!
For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.
For battery Energizer already 25 reviews.
In the rating best water pump already 12 brands participate!
In the rating best timing belt already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!
In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating tires for Subaru Outback already 50 brands participate!
For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
Which tires to choose — Sava or PHANTOM?
If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare tires across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which tires are better — PHANTOM or Sava?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Sava were overall better than PHANTOM.
- Sava received a PR Score of 84 out of 100, and PHANTOM scored 46 points.
- Sava ranked 34 in the overall ranking, and PHANTOM ranked 58.
- The average rating is higher for Sava (3.9) than for PHANTOM (2.9).
-
Tires Sava have better feature ratings than PHANTOM:
- Grip - owners believe, that this property for Sava is better than PHANTOM.
- Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for Sava is outperforms PHANTOM.
- Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for PHANTOM is preferred to Sava.
Which tires are more popular — Sava or PHANTOM?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Sava were overall more popular than PHANTOM.
By vote balance, tires Sava surpassed PHANTOM:
- For Sava, the ratio of positive (55) to negative (10) votes is 45 votes.
- For PHANTOM, the ratio of positive (20) to negative (23) votes is -3 votes.
By number of reviews, tires Sava surpassed PHANTOM:
- For tires Sava there are 21 review: 17 positive, 2 neutral, 2 negative.
- For tires PHANTOM there are 12 reviews: 2 positive, 7 neutral, 3 negative.
Which tires do car owners prefer — Sava or PHANTOM?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires Sava and PHANTOM have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.
Other comparisons of tires
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of tires Sava with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
Also available: comparisons of tires PHANTOM with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.