vs
Tires Triangle or DEBICA
Debica navigator 3. Sunt mai ok iarna fata de ce no nameuri \u00eemi puneam de \"iarna\"
Pros: mai ok iarna
Debica Frigo 2, puse pe un Peugeot 107, toate 4 noi, pret decent, chiar se descurca bine pe zapada in conditiile in care stilul meu de condus este unul plictisitor si previzibil, n-am nimic de demonstrat.
Pros: pret decent, se descurca bine
Vehicle:
Peugeot 107
Eu personal pentru all season iti pot recomanda Debica: am avut in trecut si sunt decente.
Pros: decente, recomandate
Imk kinus ir nesuk galvos. Pats su 330i su triangle kazkokiais važiavau, buvo labai gerai, geriau nei su naudotais nokianais. Kabliukas tame, kad antrą žiemą kur kas prasčiau kibo, trečią visai akmeninės. Tai kinus perki vieniem metam.
Pros: labai gerai, geriau nei
Cons: antra žiemą prasčiau kibo
Vehicle:
BMW
I have driven a lot on Triangle winter tyres at work for 2 years. They were as good or better than the Continental and Nokian tyres from the years before.
Pros: good performance, comparable to premium brands
Am debica frigo 2, nu sunt rele, dar am mers cu mai bune. Pot spune că sunt fix de banii aia
Pros: fix de banii aia
Cons: am mers cu mai bune
Pneumatici invernali.
Beh, non necessariamente "costosi ", ma non lesinate sul prezzo per risparmiare magari 15/20€ a gomma.
Perché quando vi capita la neve seria sulla strada vi salvano la giornata.
Mi è capitato in Germania con delle gomme invernali di merda (debica) di fare un 270 in uscita da una rotonda presa piano con 2cm di neve.
Pros: salvano la giornata sulla neve
Cons: gomme invernali di merda
Cele mai proaste anvelope din via\u021ba mea au fost ni\u0219te Debica, intram foarte repede \u00een acvaplanare cu ele. A fost o u\u0219urare c\u00e2nd am sc\u0103pat de ele, de fiecare dat\u0103 c\u00e2nd era ud pe jos trebuia s\u0103 merg mai \u00eencet ca al\u021bii.
Cons: intram foarte repede \u00een acvaplanare
Schimb\u0103-le. Nu merit\u0103 s\u0103 \u00ee\u021bi ri\u0219ti via\u021ba ta \u0219i a celor din jur.
Poteva andare peggio: potevi aver preso delle Triangle AdvanteX TC101...
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads OEM Alfa Romeo got the first review!
The brake caliper OEM BMW got the first review!
The brake pads OEM Infiniti got the first review!
For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.
For battery Energizer already 25 reviews.
In the rating best water pump already 12 brands participate!
In the rating best timing belt already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!
In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating tires for Subaru Outback already 50 brands participate!
For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
Which tires to choose — Triangle or DEBICA?
If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare tires across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which tires are better — DEBICA or Triangle?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires DEBICA were overall better than Triangle.
- Triangle received a PR Score of 59 out of 100, and DEBICA scored 77 points.
- Triangle ranked 51 in the overall ranking, and DEBICA ranked 49.
- The average rating is higher for DEBICA (3.5) than for Triangle (3.1).
-
Tires DEBICA have better feature ratings than Triangle:
- Ride comfort - owners believe, that this property for Triangle is better than DEBICA.
- Grip - drivers claim, that this property for DEBICA is outperforms Triangle.
- Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for DEBICA is preferred to Triangle.
Which tires are more popular — Triangle or DEBICA?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires DEBICA were overall more popular than Triangle.
By vote balance, tires DEBICA surpassed Triangle:
- For Triangle, the ratio of positive (19) to negative (13) votes is 6 votes.
- For DEBICA, the ratio of positive (34) to negative (10) votes is 24 votes.
By number of reviews, tires DEBICA surpassed Triangle:
- For tires Triangle there are 10 reviews: 5 positive, 2 neutral, 3 negative.
- For tires DEBICA there are 14 reviews: 10 positive, 2 neutral, 2 negative.
Which tires do car owners prefer — Triangle or DEBICA?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires Triangle and DEBICA have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.
Other comparisons of tires
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of tires Triangle with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
Also available: comparisons of tires DEBICA with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.