vs
Tires Triangle or MRF
Imk kinus ir nesuk galvos. Pats su 330i su triangle kazkokiais važiavau, buvo labai gerai, geriau nei su naudotais nokianais. Kabliukas tame, kad antrą žiemą kur kas prasčiau kibo, trečią visai akmeninės. Tai kinus perki vieniem metam.
Pros: labai gerai, geriau nei
Cons: antra žiemą prasčiau kibo
Vehicle:
BMW
I have driven a lot on Triangle winter tyres at work for 2 years. They were as good or better than the Continental and Nokian tyres from the years before.
Pros: good performance, comparable to premium brands
I also use MRF tyres and mine are running solid for 4+ years. I had 2-3 pinhole punctures which were all repaired eith that mushroom like thing.
Pros: running solid, long lifespan
Cons: minor punctures
Ive used triangle snow tires with good results.
Pros: good results
I have the MRF Markus on my car; they are overall a great tire, but the road conditions, especially after monsoon, are absolute shit, and these low-profile EV tires struggle a bit.
Pros: great tire overall
Cons: struggle on bad roads
I have had a similar experience, yes that's the procedure. The tire will be sent to MRF'S factor or Lab, from where they will confirm that it's a manufacturing defect not the users problem. They will give you a replacement.
Pros: replacement provided
Cons: manufacturing defect
Vehicle:
Volkswagen
I burst my Elevate tyre due to my mistake (side wall damage), only 3k KMs on the odometer. MRF rejected the claim but Honda provided new tyre for free as a part of goodwill warranty.
Cons: tire burst, warranty rejected
Vehicle:
Honda
Mileage: 3000 km
Same happened with my mrf ecotred just after 15000 km...got no claim... changed all 4 tyres to bridgestone coz safety is primary
Cons: tire defect, no warranty claim, safety concern
Mileage: 15000 km
My Amaze 2nd gen had same issue , MRF ZVTV was tyre , go to MRF tyres and they will get it changed under warranty
Cons: tire defect, warranty claim
Vehicle:
Honda
Same issue with my Skoda Rapid. Got it replaced immediately at Ekkatuthangal MRF on a pro rata basis.
Cons: tire defect, pro rata replacement
Vehicle:
Skoda Rapid
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The power steering pump OEM Volvo got the first review!
The brake pads OEM Infiniti got the first review!
The brake cylinder Raybestos got the first review!
For tires OEM Toyota already 25 reviews.
For tires IRONMAN already 25 reviews.
In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!
In the rating best antifreeze already 9 brands participate!
In the rating best engine radiator already 9 brands participate!
In the auto rating shock absorbers for Ford Ranger already 20 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake discs for Volkswagen Golf already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!
For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page