Tires YOKOHAMA or GENERAL TIRE
I got Yokohama Avids at 102k, now the van is at 130k and they still look brand new so I highly recommend Yokohamas.
I have the older version RT43's in my Lexus ES300 - they run really well but I will probably replace them in the next 2 years
I went with the Yokohama Avid Ascend GTs. Very similar tire just higher quality than the stock. Replaced my stock Avid GTs at 46k. Up to 58k now and I can say I like them.
You can’t go wrong with Falken RT660s though Yokohama A052s are a hair faster.
I have my second set of Yokohama Geolanders GO15s on my '14. The first set had inconsistent tire wear because I let them go without rotation a little too long. I replaced them at 50k. If they had worn evenly I feel I could have gotten the full 65k out of them.
The road noise and mileage are just as good as the Continentals that came stock on mine. I have that little extra grip on the gravel and dirt back roads.
Factory tyres wore through quickly within around 3 years, but the larger yokohamas I fitted then have barely lost 1mm of tread.
I put General Altimax 365AW on my Volt and I love them. They are like winter level tires you can drive all year. They’re quiet and I didn’t notice an impact on the range.
Yokohama is my choice. They tend to do very well on Hondas. They also last a long time too.
Had new 701’s on my wagon when I bought it, seemed like a decent tire.
I bought tires for my model 3. They only lasted me 20K with normal driving. They didn’t handle well in dry condition too. One of the worst tires I bought.
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.