ate typ 200 because it sees snow and wet rallycross courses.
Pros: suitable for snow, suitable for wet rallycross
Vehicle:
Toyota
Reviews of ATE brake fluid
Share on social networks:
I primarily use TYP 200 because it provides the same level of performance.
Pros: same performance level
ATE is all I use in my Road Racing Vintage Car. Flush once a year, great braking, I'm in a Pinto that can outbrake most Miatas, it generates some good heating and the fluid does great, no complaints.
Pros: great braking, no complaints
Vehicle:
Ford
Ate 200 caused my master cylinder in my M2 Competition to squeak. Wound up having to re flush with OE low viscosity fluid then again with SRF. It's a known problem in a few cars.
Cons: caused master cylinder squeak
Vehicle:
BMW M2
I've used ATE for 15 years and never boiled it at autoX.
Pros: never boiled
Vehicle:
Toyota MR2
On my Miata I run ATE Typ 200 and aven’t had any issues. I also run Hawk HP+ and some here would say they’re not a track pad, but for a light car they’re great.
Pros: great for light car
Vehicle:
Mazda 5
I use the ATE 200 in my NB and will continue to for the foreseeable future it's been great stuff
Pros: great stuff, reliable
Vehicle:
Mazda
For our light weight cars, ATE Typ 200 is good for basically all applications, up until you’re getting into high horsepower builds (motor swaps, high boost forced induction).
Pros: good for all applications
Cons: not for high horsepower
ATE Original TYP 200 is the GOAT. Look at the wet pointing point: 388F for ATE. 401F for Motul. An extra 13F isn't worth the price difference.
Pros: great performance, good value
ATE Typ 200 is more than enough for autocross & daily and lasts longer between recommended full flush.
Pros: more than enough, lasts longer
Vehicle:
Mazda
Write your review about brake fluid ATE
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons brake fluid ATE
Other brake fluid
Popular spare parts ATE
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads OEM Alfa Romeo got the first review!
The brake caliper OEM BMW got the first review!
The brake pads OEM Infiniti got the first review!
For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.
For battery Energizer already 25 reviews.
In the rating best water pump already 12 brands participate!
In the rating best timing belt already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!
In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating tires for Subaru Outback already 50 brands participate!
For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
What we know about ATE brake fluid
The brand is registered in Germany.
In March 2026, PartReview has a mixed opinion of ATE brake fluid. PR Score — 84 out of 100, based on 33 reviews and 101 vote. 27 positive reviews, 2 neutral reviews, 4 negative reviews. Average rating — 4.1 (out of 5). Votes: 85 up, 16 down.
Users also evaluated the qualities of ATE brake fluid:
- Pedal feel - spongy pedal or longer travel signals degraded fluid - rated positively. 3.9 points out of 5.
- Warning light - brake warning or low fluid indicator may appear - rated positively. 5 points out of 5.
- Leaks - wet traces near wheels or master cylinder are visible - rated positively. 5 points out of 5.
Brake fluid ATE in car-specific ratings
See which car brands and models owners choose ATE brake fluid for. Below are car-specific ratings where this part is in the Top-3:
- ATE ranked #1 in brake fluid ratings for: Volkswagen Golf .
- ATE ranked #2 for: Volkswagen Passat .
Brake fluid ATE in comparisons
There are 1 comparison of ATE brake fluid with other manufacturers on PartReview.
In particular, see which brake fluid are better: ATE or MOTUL .