Reviews of K&N air filter

PR Score ? Shows the percentage of positive votes. Learn more about the score in the help

Based on 284 reviews and 907 votes

907 votes

Average rating ? The average rating is calculated based only on review ratings, excluding votes
3.5
Visible dirt:
2.4
Power:
2.9
Throttle response:
3.2

284 reviews

Description
No.1 in the rating

among 5 manufacturers

Share on social networks:

Filter

Part:

Air filter
Back
  • loading...

Manufacturer:

K&N
Back
  • loading...

Make:

Select make
Back
  • loading...

Generation:

Select generation
  • Vectra
  • Mokka
  • Antara
  • Astra
  • SPORTS TOURER
  • Meriva
  • Zafira Tourer
Review tone
Reviews found: 0
K&N Air filter

I got a K&N filter and I like it, though it ended up being a tad on the large side. I don't think it matters much compared to any other cone filter, but that's just me

Pros: I like it
Cons: a tad large
Vehicle: Mazda
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
K&N Air filter
Rating 5.0
  • Visible dirt:

Ran a K&N for years in my Focus SVT, put on a supercharger and blew it up…with 110,000 K&N filter miles the cylinders still had cross hatching. I suspect that means the filter did its job

Pros: filter did its job
Vehicle: Ford Focus
Mileage: 110000 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
K&N Air filter
Rating 4.0
  • Power:
  • Visible dirt:

I've been using the K&N for three years.

I swap it for a new one every couple of years because washing it and re-oiling it is a pain and an art form! As the K&N cost twice as much as the paper filter but I keep it twice as long, it doesn't cost me more money.

The power gain is probably 0.0001%. but the filter changes the noise of your engine ever so slightly, it's slightly more aggressive. I'm about to have a Racing Beat ram air duct fitted which will add another 0.5 HP and some more aggressive noises.

On a serious basis, your car will breathe slightly batter with the K&N, so that's a benefit.

The K&N can "leak" some oil and it doesn't filter small particles as well as the paper filter. This means your MAF sensor is at risk of being contaminated. But I have it cleaned twice a year when I get the car serviced, so that solves/avoids this particular problem.

All in all, go K&N!!!!

Pros: slightly more aggressive noise
Cons: oil leak, poor filtration
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
K&N Air filter
Rating 1.0
  • Visible dirt:
  • Throttle response:

Thanks for posting this question, mine came with the K&N from the previous owner and the airbox baffles removed. I put them back in along with a new paper filter early on. When that soiled I remembered the K&N was hanging out in a box. Bought a cleaning kit and did my best to follow the directions, removed the air box baffles again (I had at the time recently read about how it may increase flow and improve the sound of the intake), and once clean, popped the 'wet' K&N in.

Fast forward 6k miles and I start having a bit of a rough idle even after all new upgraded ignition components, starter, battery, premixing, and cat delete and so I decided to check the MAF (which I had cleaned back when replacing the SSV solenoid) - fucking filthy! Oil all up in the throttle body. That shit let a mess in there, man! Cleaned the MAF and back to paper we go. Car is healthier than it has been since I have owned it. The intake on the 8 was designed very thoughtfully and very well to run stock components - paper filter and baffles included. I regret messing with it based on old ass posts on RX8club from before the info others have posted here was well understood.

Cons: oil in throttle body, rough idle
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 6000 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
K&N Air filter
Rating 5.0
  • Throttle response:

I swapped all this, gas pedal, coil packs and checked all plugs, throttle body with TPS and IAC all as one unit, fuel pump, filter is already new. I did one thing at a time then test drove it, nothing made a difference in the issue. So I thought let me go back to the 2008 MAF, (had the 2006 MAF in it), I'll clean the 2008 MAF real good, and run with the Cone style K&N filter off. It took a few miles but it was a near instant fix, it ran perfect. I stopped and put the K&N Cone style air filter back on and drove 3 more miles, and it started to act up again and stalled on a slow turn. So I put the OE Air Filter box and tube etc.. back on, and WALLA!! It runs perfect. It was totally an Air Delivery issue!

Pros: near instant fix, runs perfect
Cons: started to act up, stalled
Vehicle: Ford Crown Victoria
Mileage: 109000 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
K&N Air filter
Rating 1.0
  • Power:
  • Visible dirt:
  • Throttle response:

The only things the k&n filter will do is add dust to your engine, warm air for your engine, intake noise to your ears and annoying raspy sounds when you WOT.

Cons: adds dust, warm air, annoying noise
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
K&N Air filter

I'm gonna guess it's like k&n or aem. I've got k&n without the lid and I get some noticeable intake noise and when I shift from inside the car.

Pros: noticeable intake noise
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
K&N Air filter

Yup, I already ordered a sinister diesel intake, the K&N really didn’t perform well on the truck, goin for more flow

Pros: goin for more flow
Cons: didn’t perform well
Vehicle: Ford
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
K&N Air filter
Rating 3.5
  • Throttle response:

I wind up usually coming back to K&N as I have ran them in about 5 different vehicles over the years including in Corvettes and 8cyl. trucks. I prefer them unoiled after cleaning that way you minimize fouling the maf sensor. As far as performance gains in my 1.4l base Jetta- throttle response is a bit improved but I don’t know if there is a gain in hp (6spd manual as well).

Pros: improved throttle response
Cons: uncertain HP gain
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
1 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 29

Write your review about air filter K&N

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Comparisons air filter K&N
Other air filter
Popular spare parts K&N

Activity feed

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake discs WAGNER has only 5 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake pads NIPPARTS got the first review!

The brake discs Hella got the first review!

The brake discs Hella Pagid has only 4 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake caliper Raybestos has only 9 reviews. Maybe add one more?

For tires OEM Toyota already 25 reviews.

For tires IRONMAN already 25 reviews.

In the rating best ignition coil already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!

In the rating best turbocharger already 4 brands participate!

In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for BMW M2 already 5 brands participate!

The manual transmission OEM FORD has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The brake discs Tesla has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The tie rods 555 has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The engine oil AMSOIL already has 1000 votes!

The brake pads OEM Subaru already has 250 votes!

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

The engine radiator MISHIMOTO already has 300 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

Loading...