Brake pads ATE or OEM KIA
For normal driving I'd recommend either ATE Ceramic pads, paired with ATE, painted or coated discs.
Get Ate ceramic. never (almost never) have to wash your wheels again
I have a 22 Telly, 103k miles. I’ve replaced rear or front brake pads can’t remember which at 102k, and routine oil changes. THAT’S IT.
I am on my second Kia vehicle, and they both have been amazing. 100k miles on my optima when it was totaled, and only thing ever replaced were the brakes at like 80k miles, besides regular oil changes.
I've only replaced my break pads twice and one new pair of car tires.
Brakes and hoses ATE.
I bought a 2023 kia soul specifically for uber and just hit 100000 miles. Only problems ive had are nails in my tires and recently changed my rear brake pads.
Meiner Erfahrung nach bremst das genauso gut wie andere Bremsen, das Problem ist nach 10tkm sportlicher Fahrweise sind Bel\u00e4ge und Scheiben leer, normale Fahrweise max 20tkm. Felgen Kohlschwarz weil nat\u00fcrlich mega viel Bremsstaub in kurzer Zeit.
The Stinger is notorious for this same problem—I know first hand. Sad part is don’t let Kia touch it because the problem is the brake pad. OE pad material adheres to the rotor.
Kia Sportage SUV, brakes locked up about 2K miles in, shop "fixed" it, the next week it literally spontaneously combusted in the wee hours of the morning.
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Which brake pads to choose — ATE or OEM KIA?
If choosing brake pads across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare brake pads across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which brake pads are better — OEM KIA or ATE?
In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads ATE were overall better than OEM KIA.
- ATE received a PR Score of 87 out of 100, and OEM KIA scored 64 points.
- ATE ranked 11 in the overall ranking, and OEM KIA ranked 41.
- The average rating is higher for ATE (4.2) than for OEM KIA (3.5).
-
Brake pads ATE have better feature ratings than OEM KIA:
- Noise - owners believe, that this property for ATE is better than OEM KIA.
- Braking - drivers claim, that this property for ATE is outperforms OEM KIA.
- Dust - reviews suggest, that this property for ATE is preferred to OEM KIA.
Which brake pads are more popular — ATE or OEM KIA?
In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads ATE were overall more popular than OEM KIA.
By vote balance, brake pads ATE surpassed OEM KIA:
- For ATE, the ratio of positive (154) to negative (22) votes is 132 votes.
- For OEM KIA, the ratio of positive (34) to negative (19) votes is 15 votes.
By number of reviews, brake pads ATE surpassed OEM KIA:
- For brake pads ATE there are 56 reviews: 46 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative.
- For brake pads OEM KIA there are 16 reviews: 8 positive, 5 neutral, 3 negative.
Which brake pads do car owners prefer — ATE or OEM KIA?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, brake pads ATE led more car-specific ratings than OEM KIA:
ATE are chosen by owners of cars such as: BMW M4, Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Polo, and others.
Brake pads OEM KIA have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.
Other comparisons of brake pads
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of brake pads ATE with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.
Also available: comparisons of brake pads OEM KIA with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.
You can also see who is better among other brake pads manufacturers: EBC or POWER STOP, EBC or Akebono, EBC or Hawk Performance, Brembo or EBC, Akebono or POWER STOP.