Brake pads Carbotech or Hawk Performance

Filter

Part:

Brake pads
Back
  • loading...

Manufacturer:

All
Back
  • loading...

Make:

Select make
Back
  • loading...

Generation:

Select generation
  • Vectra
  • Mokka
  • Antara
  • Astra
  • SPORTS TOURER
  • Meriva
  • Zafira Tourer
Review tone
Reviews found: 0
Hawk Performance Brake pads
DEO3
Rating 4.0
  • Braking:
  • Dust:

I was pretty unhappy with the short life span/brake dust of the stock rotors/pads, so when it was time to change them I went with: Centric Cryo-Treated rotors, Hawk HP Street 5.0 pads. I got what I was looking for in terms of improvements to longevity and brake dust, but I'd be lying if I said I didn't miss the bite of the stock setup.

Pros: improved longevity, less brake dust
Cons: missed stock bite
Vehicle: Ford Fiesta
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
ottrocity
Rating 4.0
  • Braking:
  • Dust:

Centric high-carbon rotors and Hawk HP Street 5.0s. Less initial bite than the OEM pads, but more stopping force with higher pedal pressures and much less dust.

Pros: more stopping force, much less dust
Cons: less initial bite
Vehicle: Ford Fiesta
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads

For pads I'm having pretty good success with the new Hawk Ceramic 5.0. I run those on my GLI(with Golf R calipers/brakes) and on the .:R. I was surprised for light track duty they were ok on both cars. Not a full on track pad to be clear. They are also a high torque pad so they have really good bite.

Pros: high torque, good bite
Cons: not for full track
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads

I only daily as well but I did a slight upgrade due to some spirited runs each year. I did Hawk ceramics and DBA T2 rotors. Theyre enjoyably different but likely overkill.

Pros: enjoyably different
Cons: likely overkill
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads

I'm not happy with HPS 5.0 on my M3- I'm probably going to switch back to "regular" Hawk HPS, as they have worked for me on quite a few cars.

Pros: worked on many cars
Cons: not happy with performance
Vehicle: BMW
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
1 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ... 50

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Comparisons
Show all

Activity feed

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake caliper ATE has only 9 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake discs OEM Alfa Romeo has only 2 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake discs FEBI got the first review!

The brake discs APR has only 4 reviews. Maybe add one more?

For tires OEM Toyota already 25 reviews.

For tires IRONMAN already 25 reviews.

In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!

In the rating best windshield already 14 brands participate!

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

In the rating best turbocharger already 4 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake discs for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating tires for Ford Mustang already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating shock absorbers for Ford Ranger already 5 brands participate!

The brake pads Girling has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The ABS sensor ATE has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The brake pads G-brake has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The brake pads OEM Subaru already has 250 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

The tires OEM FORD already has 100 votes!

The engine oil AMSOIL already has 1000 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

Loading...