Brake pads EBC or Carbotech

Filter

Part:

Brake pads
Back
  • loading...

Manufacturer:

All
Back
  • loading...

Make:

Select make
Back
  • loading...

Generation:

Select generation
  • Vectra
  • Mokka
  • Antara
  • Astra
  • SPORTS TOURER
  • Meriva
  • Zafira Tourer
Review tone
Reviews found: 0
Carbotech Brake pads
GronkDaSlayer
Rating 4.0
  • Braking:
  • Noise:

Carbotech is the way :) Seriously though, I have XP-12 front and XP-8 rear on my Elise and had XP-12 on my Focus ST and they are great. Tried the Hawks on one car, and hated them. Downside of the carbotech is the insane squealing on the street.

Pros: great performance
Cons: insane squealing
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
EBC Brake pads
S1ack
Rating 4.0
  • Braking:

ONE8TURBSKI said: Check for brake pad deposits, VW uses absolute garbage for pads these days. Click to expand... Yeah so I think this may be it. I took it out a weekend morning ago and did some standing on the brakes. It's much better now. Actually can live with it.

Pros: much better now
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Carbotech Brake pads
as350
Rating 4.0
  • Braking:
  • Dust:

I've had very good results using Carbotech pads. Their street pad compount 1521 is comparable to OEM but without the brake dust and their various XP track pads have been very consistent and predictable.

Pros: comparable to OEM, consistent
Cons: without the brake dust
Vehicle: Audi
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
EBC Brake pads
Vegas-RoadsTTer
Rating 4.0
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:

My pad in recent years has been EBC red. Better initial bite than OEM, no fade, no dust, no noise. If you track, EBC yellow might be a better choice but they tend to squeal at low speed. My only negative opinion is Hawk HPS which had scary bad initial bite when cold. They were OK after a few stops.

Pros: better initial bite, no fade
Cons: Hawk HPS bad initial bite
Vehicle: Audi TT
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
EBC Brake pads

I have the ebc reds they are good but smh at the people saying they are not dusty. they are worst pads i have ever had for producing dust.

Pros: they are good
Cons: worst pads for dust
Vehicle: Audi TT
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
1 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 ... 79

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Comparisons
Show all

Activity feed

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake caliper ATE has only 9 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake fluid OEM Subaru has only 2 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake discs OEM Subaru has only 8 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake discs FEBI got the first review!

In the rating best shock absorbers already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!

In the rating best windshield already 14 brands participate!

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating battery for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!

The roof rack YAKIMA has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The brake pads G-brake has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The piston rings OEM Honda has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The engine radiator MISHIMOTO already has 300 votes!

The engine oil AMSOIL already has 1000 votes!

For tires GISLAVED already 25 reviews.

The tires OEM FORD already has 100 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

Loading...