Brake pads Raybestos or Hawk Performance

Filter

Part:

Brake pads
Back
  • loading...

Manufacturer:

All
Back
  • loading...

Make:

Select make
Back
  • loading...

Generation:

Select generation
  • Vectra
  • Mokka
  • Antara
  • Astra
  • SPORTS TOURER
  • Meriva
  • Zafira Tourer
Review tone
Reviews found: 0
Raybestos Brake pads
CompWizrd
Rating 4.5
  • Braking:

I have Raybestos AT's(96087) on my front, and Hawk HPS HB418F.646 pads. Don't think Hawk makes the HPS pads anymore though. I'm at about 2.5 years on mine, got 4 years out of the last set, after putting up with the OEM's for 4.5 years. Still on the factory rear drums.

Far better than OEM.

Pros: far better than OEM
Vehicle: Honda Fit
Part number: 96087
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Raybestos Brake pads
Slimy_Shart_Socket
Rating 4.5
  • Braking:
  • Dust:

So I don't work for Raybestos but I do install a ton of them. Those EHT are really good for normal vehicles. The price is right, dust is low, pedal feel is great, friction is about on par with OEM and in some cases better. They will survive about 10-15 medium effort stops, and about 3-5 Hard ABS stops. I wouldn't put them in anything bigger than a 7-Seater V6 Crossover, and the weight of those is on the limit of what the pads can do, but over all very good.

Pros: good price, low dust, great pedal feel, good friction
Cons: limited for heavy vehicles
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
econsj
Rating 4.5
  • Braking:
  • Dust:

if you are sick and tired of scrubbing your wheels then i would highly recommend ceramic pads as the dust is a fraction of the OEM pads. I just changed out mine a few months ago (hawk ceramic from pelican parts) and the change is night and day. I don't track may car and i would say i'm mildly spirited in my driving, but these have been great so far.

Pros: less dust, night and day change
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
Tylpt
Rating 5.0
  • Braking:
  • Dust:

I had about 21,000 kms on my GLI and noticed a little bit of vibration at higher speed braking. I was sick of the OEM pads dust so I swapped out the pads to Hawk HPS street 5.0's. The front rotors had a ton of wear on it for a relatively new car. I heard from a few shops that the OEM pads eat rotors. I decided to change the front rotors but kept the rears as there was hardly any wear on it. Brake pedal feels much more solid and next to no brake dust and better braking power. Great upgrade and strongly recommend.

Pros: better braking power, less dust
Cons: front rotors wear
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 21000 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
UniverseCatalyzed
Rating 4.0
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:

Hawk HP+ is a very good multiuse pad if you can get them for your car. Be warned - they will squeak pretty loudly and dust your wheels, but they work fine on the street, great in the canyons, and will still last at least a few sessions on track.

Pros: good multiuse, works well on street and canyons
Cons: squeaks loudly, dusts wheels
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
ArmenB
Rating 3.5
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:

I used them on the street and in autocross on my '79 RX-7 and would agree that they were noisy and dusty on the street - the dust also ate through the finish on my wheels on that car. I didn't have fade issues with them, but that car was light and not very powerful, so it wasn't very hard on brakes.

Pros: no fade issues
Cons: noisy and dusty
Vehicle: Mazda
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
ghost03
Rating 2.0
  • Braking:
  • Noise:

The M240i needed new pads and rotors. I order HPS 5.0 + Zimmerman rotors from FCP's site which says they're compatible. I install them and the car sounds like a jalopy. Loud wub wub wub under braking and only braking, more pressure == more loud. It sounds like it's coming from both fronts.

Cons: loud wub wub wub
Vehicle: BMW
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
1 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 ... 49

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Comparisons
Show all

Activity feed

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake discs WAGNER has only 5 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake pads NIPPARTS got the first review!

The brake discs Hella got the first review!

The brake discs Hella Pagid has only 4 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake caliper Raybestos has only 9 reviews. Maybe add one more?

For tires OEM Toyota already 25 reviews.

For tires IRONMAN already 25 reviews.

In the rating best ignition coil already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!

In the rating best turbocharger already 4 brands participate!

In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for BMW M2 already 5 brands participate!

The manual transmission OEM FORD has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The brake discs Tesla has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The tie rods 555 has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The engine oil AMSOIL already has 1000 votes!

The brake pads OEM Subaru already has 250 votes!

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

The engine radiator MISHIMOTO already has 300 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

Loading...