vs
Tires ADVAN or MRF
I also use MRF tyres and mine are running solid for 4+ years. I had 2-3 pinhole punctures which were all repaired eith that mushroom like thing.
Pros: running solid, long lifespan
Cons: minor punctures
I had Bridgestone B250 165/80 R14 as stock on my Ritz 2011, those were very bad at braking performance, and didn\u2019t provide any kind of comfort at all, even the underbody touched a few speed breakers when the car was fully loaded. But then I switched to MRF ZLX 185/70 R14 tyres and those were in a league of their own, great braking, comfort and much less body roll.
Pros: great braking, comfort
Cons: bad braking performance
Vehicle:
Suzuki
Same in my Nexon, so far the tyres have been good. One tyre had a sidewall puncture after 28k kms. Replaced it with the same. The rest of them are running without zero punctures in 37.6k kms, and have seen all kinds of terrains. I'm quite satisfied with the performance.
Pros: satisfied with performance
Cons: sidewall puncture
Mileage: 37600 km
Hey guys, Thanks to you guys, I got it checked on time through MRF FAAST and got a replacement for less than half the price of new tyre.
Pros: replacement for less price
Vehicle:
Skoda
I have the MRF Markus on my car; they are overall a great tire, but the road conditions, especially after monsoon, are absolute shit, and these low-profile EV tires struggle a bit.
Pros: great tire overall
Cons: struggle on bad roads
I have had a similar experience, yes that's the procedure. The tire will be sent to MRF'S factor or Lab, from where they will confirm that it's a manufacturing defect not the users problem. They will give you a replacement.
Pros: replacement provided
Cons: manufacturing defect
Vehicle:
Volkswagen
Same happened with my mrf ecotred just after 15000 km...got no claim... changed all 4 tyres to bridgestone coz safety is primary
Cons: tire defect, no warranty claim, safety concern
Mileage: 15000 km
My Amaze 2nd gen had same issue , MRF ZVTV was tyre , go to MRF tyres and they will get it changed under warranty
Cons: tire defect, warranty claim
Vehicle:
Honda
Same issue with my Skoda Rapid. Got it replaced immediately at Ekkatuthangal MRF on a pro rata basis.
Cons: tire defect, pro rata replacement
Vehicle:
Skoda Rapid
Same issue with my virtus. Got replaced tyre under warranty
Cons: tire defect, warranty claim
Vehicle:
Volkswagen
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads NIPPARTS got the first review!
The brake discs Hella got the first review!
The brake discs OEM Suzuki got the first review!
For tires OEM Toyota already 25 reviews.
For tires IRONMAN already 25 reviews.
For starter motor OEM Volkswagen already 25 reviews.
In the rating best ignition coil already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!
In the rating best turbocharger already 4 brands participate!
In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for BMW M2 already 5 brands participate!
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
