vs
Tires Barum or MRF
Am Barum Polaris 5 si mi-au placut, erau ieftine, acu 3 ani le-am luat cu 1000 toate 4 205/55/R16. Sunt moi, au sant pentru aderenta pe ploaie, dar dupa teste nu par ca exceleaza acolo, eu nu am simtit, iar pe zapada sunt excelente. Barum este sub-brand Continental si au fost facute in UE. Probabil sunt prea moi, si se consuma mai rapid, dar nu ma deranjat, oricum ma lovesc mai intai de vechime decat de cat de consumate sunt, si au tinut 3 sezoane sigur merg si al patrulea. Deasemenea se umplu de pietricele prin gauri. Not top performance, dar ok,
Pros: ieftine, excelente pe zăpadă, durabile
Cons: moi, se umplu de pietricele, performanță medie pe ploaie
eu am mers pe Barum. Nu sunt premium, dar nici chinezarii, chiar fabricate in Cehia. Intru in a 3-a iarna cu ele si pana acum si-au facut treaba fara probleme.
Pros: fabricate în Cehia, fără probleme
Cons: nu sunt premium
I also use MRF tyres and mine are running solid for 4+ years. I had 2-3 pinhole punctures which were all repaired eith that mushroom like thing.
Pros: running solid, long lifespan
Cons: minor punctures
Ja koristim Barum Polaris gume. Zadovoljan sam odnosom cene i kvaliteta.
Pros: dobar odnos cena-kvalitet
Ja sam svojevremeno uzeo kog IPG Barum gume, bile su među najjeftinijim, ispalo je da sam odlično pazario, gume su solidne, ja malo vozim, dogodine ću morati da ih menjam zbog starosti iako je šara i dalje dobra. Par vulkanizera su izh pohvalili kao veoma zahvalne, dobiješ solidne gume za malo para.
Pros: solidne gume, dobra šara, odlična kupovina
I had got the same issue and yeah normal mrf dealer said the same thing. Best option is go to the mrf warehouse...in my case it was just a 10 minute process. Then the guy did a quick inspection of the wear and tear. Mine was less than 5 mm so I wasn't charged anything and got a replacement tyre instantly.
Pros: quick replacement
Cons: tire defect
Same issue with my virtus. Got replaced tyre under warranty
Cons: tire defect, warranty claim
Vehicle:
Volkswagen
Happened to my MRF tyres too! A bubble on the sidewall. Had to get the tyres replaced.
Cons: sidewall bubble, required replacement
Vehicle:
Honda City
Same issue on my Taigun. Those mrfs are bad. The showroom and mrf said that it was due to impact damage and refused to replace initially.
Cons: bad quality, warranty refusal
Vehicle:
Volkswagen
My brezza came with MRF Ecotreds as well, I have already gotten 2 sidewall punctures in 28k kms. Had to scrap one tire entirely. So frustrating
Cons: multiple sidewall punctures, tire scrapped
Vehicle:
Suzuki
Mileage: 28000 km
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads NIPPARTS got the first review!
The brake discs Hella got the first review!
The brake discs OEM Suzuki got the first review!
For tires OEM Toyota already 25 reviews.
For tires IRONMAN already 25 reviews.
For starter motor OEM Volkswagen already 25 reviews.
In the rating best ignition coil already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!
In the rating best turbocharger already 4 brands participate!
In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for BMW M2 already 5 brands participate!
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
