vs
Tires Barum or OEM Honda
Am Barum Polaris 5 si mi-au placut, erau ieftine, acu 3 ani le-am luat cu 1000 toate 4 205/55/R16. Sunt moi, au sant pentru aderenta pe ploaie, dar dupa teste nu par ca exceleaza acolo, eu nu am simtit, iar pe zapada sunt excelente. Barum este sub-brand Continental si au fost facute in UE. Probabil sunt prea moi, si se consuma mai rapid, dar nu ma deranjat, oricum ma lovesc mai intai de vechime decat de cat de consumate sunt, si au tinut 3 sezoane sigur merg si al patrulea. Deasemenea se umplu de pietricele prin gauri. Not top performance, dar ok,
Pros: ieftine, excelente pe zăpadă, durabile
Cons: moi, se umplu de pietricele, performanță medie pe ploaie
eu am mers pe Barum. Nu sunt premium, dar nici chinezarii, chiar fabricate in Cehia. Intru in a 3-a iarna cu ele si pana acum si-au facut treaba fara probleme.
Pros: fabricate în Cehia, fără probleme
Cons: nu sunt premium
Ja koristim Barum Polaris gume. Zadovoljan sam odnosom cene i kvaliteta.
Pros: dobar odnos cena-kvalitet
Ja sam svojevremeno uzeo kog IPG Barum gume, bile su među najjeftinijim, ispalo je da sam odlično pazario, gume su solidne, ja malo vozim, dogodine ću morati da ih menjam zbog starosti iako je šara i dalje dobra. Par vulkanizera su izh pohvalili kao veoma zahvalne, dobiješ solidne gume za malo para.
Pros: solidne gume, dobra šara, odlična kupovina
Ja koristim Barum odlicne su! Niza cena a mislim da je slican kvalitet kao Continental
Pros: odlicne, niza cena
Pana acum nu am avut deloc probleme chiar si in conditii mai speciale. Mereu cand au fost conditii de vreme mai dificile am adaptat viteza incat sa conduc in siguranta.
Pros: nu am avut probleme
Barum Polaris 6. Au fost foarte bine cotate inclusiv versiunile anterioare (eu am folosit Polaris 3) in cateva clasamente din anii anteriori, fiind deseori in primele 5 locuri umar la umar cu marcile premium.
Pros: foarte bine cotate
Finally, check your tire date codes. Tires older than 6 or 7 years are no longer suitable for riding on, as they have lost a lot of their elasticity and therefore grip.
Pros: check date codes
Cons: lost elasticity, lost grip
Vehicle:
Honda
Had them in 245/45r18. Really comfortable, fuel efficient, good grip but average feedback. I was really happy with them until i had to do an emergency brake and the car just kept going. Afterwards I went and read tyre tests and all tests confirmed that their braking is horrible both in dry and wet.
They are dangerous in emergency situations
Pros: comfortable, fuel efficient, good grip
Cons: horrible braking, dangerous
I used to think Honda is great until we had a CRV. It was a piece of crap. It shakes at low speed or highway speed. The dealer was so incompetent and kept asking us to replace tires, wheels all at our own cost but the problem was still there.
Cons: shakes at low speed
Vehicle:
Honda
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads NIPPARTS got the first review!
The brake discs Hella got the first review!
The brake discs OEM Suzuki got the first review!
For tires OEM Toyota already 25 reviews.
For tires IRONMAN already 25 reviews.
For starter motor OEM Volkswagen already 25 reviews.
In the rating best ignition coil already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!
In the rating best turbocharger already 4 brands participate!
In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for BMW M2 already 5 brands participate!
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
