Tires BFGoodrich or IRONMAN

Filter

Part:

Tires
Back
  • loading...

Manufacturer:

All
Back
  • loading...

Make:

Select make
Back
  • loading...

Generation:

Select generation
  • Vectra
  • Mokka
  • Antara
  • Astra
  • SPORTS TOURER
  • Meriva
  • Zafira Tourer
Review tone
Reviews found: 0
BFGoodrich Tires

Stock Pirellis were getting a little low after about 35,000 miles and decided to upgrade a bit. Went with KO2s 245/65/17. Love the fitment even more. They’re slightly wider than the stock 225s. Make a huge difference off-road and feels more like a truck when driving.

Pros: huge difference off-road
Cons: wore out pretty quick
Mileage: 35000 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
BFGoodrich Tires

Your KO2s/KO3s are excellent tires, you don't need any other tires for a 3 mile drive. They are 3PMS tires and perform well on ice among AT tires.

Pros: excellent tires, perform well
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
IRONMAN Tires
Tin_Can_739
Rating 3.0
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:

Ironman and milemaker are the last two sets and they lasted about 75% of what a premium brand would.

Cons: shorter lifespan
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
BFGoodrich Tires

I absolutely hate using the KO2's. They're a long lasting tire with a high load rating, but that's because the rubber compound is hard as steel. They're outright dangerous in wet and icy conditions.

Pros: long lasting tire
Cons: dangerous in wet/icy
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
BFGoodrich Tires

Worn KO2s are known to have lots of siping, but for some reason the siping doesn\u2019t go all the way down and they\u2019re known for getting pretty bad in the wet/snow vs some other off road tires.

Pros: lots of siping
Cons: bad in wet/snow
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 36

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Comparisons
Show all

Activity feed

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake pads Motorcraft has only 4 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake fluid OEM Subaru has only 2 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake pads Detroit Axle has only 8 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake caliper OEM BMW got the first review!

For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.

For battery Energizer already 25 reviews.

In the rating best water pump already 12 brands participate!

In the rating best timing belt already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!

In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!

In the auto rating tires for Subaru Outback already 50 brands participate!

The glow plug Autolite has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The fender OEM Volkswagen has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The brake discs Tesla has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

The brake pads OEM Subaru already has 250 votes!

The engine oil AMSOIL already has 1000 votes!

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

The engine radiator MISHIMOTO already has 300 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

Which tires to choose — BFGoodrich or IRONMAN?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires BFGoodrich and IRONMAN
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — IRONMAN or BFGoodrich?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires BFGoodrich were overall better than IRONMAN.

  1. BFGoodrich received a PR Score of 76 out of 100, and IRONMAN scored 66 points.
  2. BFGoodrich ranked 16 in the overall ranking, and IRONMAN ranked 39.
  3. The average rating is higher for BFGoodrich (3.8) than for IRONMAN (3.2).
  4. Tires BFGoodrich have better feature ratings than IRONMAN:
    • Grip - owners believe, that this property for BFGoodrich is better than IRONMAN.
    • Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for BFGoodrich is outperforms IRONMAN.
    • Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for BFGoodrich is preferred to IRONMAN.

Which tires are more popular — BFGoodrich or IRONMAN?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires BFGoodrich were overall more popular than IRONMAN.

By vote balance, tires BFGoodrich surpassed IRONMAN:

  • For BFGoodrich, the ratio of positive (798) to negative (246) votes is 552 votes.
  • For IRONMAN, the ratio of positive (54) to negative (27) votes is 27 votes.

By number of reviews, tires BFGoodrich surpassed IRONMAN:

  • For tires BFGoodrich there are 334 reviews: 238 positive, 42 neutral, 54 negative.
  • For tires IRONMAN there are 25 reviews: 14 positive, 6 neutral, 5 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — BFGoodrich or IRONMAN?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires BFGoodrich led more car-specific ratings than IRONMAN:

BFGoodrich are chosen by owners of cars such as: Chevrolet Silverado, Chevrolet Suburban, Toyota Sequoia, and others.

Tires IRONMAN have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires BFGoodrich with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

Also available: comparisons of tires IRONMAN with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...