Tires BRIDGESTONE or BFGoodrich

Filter

Part:

Tires
Back
  • loading...

Manufacturer:

All
Back
  • loading...

Make:

Select make
Back
  • loading...

Generation:

Select generation
  • Vectra
  • Mokka
  • Antara
  • Astra
  • SPORTS TOURER
  • Meriva
  • Zafira Tourer
Review tone
Reviews found: 0
BFGoodrich Tires
nomad2284
Rating 4.5
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:

The traction is one aspect but proven durability off road is hard to put a value on. K02s have eaten some ugly road.

Pros: proven off-road durability, good traction
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
BFGoodrich Tires
Genghis-Ron-
Rating 4.0
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:

2k miles in and I love them. 1-1.5mpg decrease from the stock OEM tires.

Pros: love them
Cons: 1-1.5mpg decrease
Vehicle: Toyota
Mileage: 3219 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I recommend the Bridgestone Blizzak. They are studless snow tires. Instead of medal studs, they embed a series of really firm rubber 'studs' into the softer rubber of the tire. They work just as well as metal studded tires, but don't chew up the road or make the annoying noise that the metal studs.

Pros: work just as well
Cons: annoying noise
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
BFGoodrich Tires

Definitely a bit less grip in the dry than the 215 PS4s, but they're actually usable in the cold, solid in the wet, and at least passable in the snow. I'm not sure how much of the change in handling is down to the taller sidewall and narrower tire, and how much is the tire compound itself.

Pros: usable in cold, wet
Cons: less grip in dry
Vehicle: Toyota
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Bridgestone Potenza RE92 are great on dry pavement; but they are a scary ride with RWD on wet, snowy, or icy pavement.

Pros: great on dry pavement
Cons: scary on wet pavement
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
BFGoodrich Tires

Long ago my first new set of tires were BFG Trail T/A in 33/12.50/15 for my old IH. With less than 5k miles sidewall deteriorated on one tire. Another on opposite corner broke or slipped a belt.

Cons: sidewall deteriorated
Mileage: 5000 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
1 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ... 125

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Comparisons
Show all

Activity feed

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake caliper ATE has only 9 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake fluid OEM Subaru has only 2 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake discs OEM Subaru has only 8 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake discs FEBI got the first review!

In the rating best shock absorbers already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!

In the rating best windshield already 14 brands participate!

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating battery for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!

The roof rack YAKIMA has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The brake pads G-brake has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The piston rings OEM Honda has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The engine radiator MISHIMOTO already has 300 votes!

The engine oil AMSOIL already has 1000 votes!

For tires GISLAVED already 25 reviews.

The tires OEM FORD already has 100 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

Loading...