Tires BRIDGESTONE or Maxxis

Filter

Part:

Tires
Back
  • loading...

Manufacturer:

All
Back
  • loading...

Make:

Select make
Back
  • loading...

Generation:

Select generation
  • Vectra
  • Mokka
  • Antara
  • Astra
  • SPORTS TOURER
  • Meriva
  • Zafira Tourer
Review tone
Reviews found: 0
BRIDGESTONE Tires

At the end (last quarter of life) you can feel the grip slowly decreasing (mostly with the rear tire), but they're not becoming vicious at any moment.

I changed them at this moment because I was moving to the advanced group, but they're awesome tires : great mileage, great performance on the road (if you need more on the streets you're a criminal ????) and still good when it's cold or raining (not as good as the T32, but still very acceptable).

Pros: great mileage, great performance
Cons: grip slowly decreasing
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Maxxis Tires
Fyvz
Rating 4.0
  • Grip:

I've gone from XR4s to DHR/DHF. If there is an increase in rolling resistance, the only place I think I notice it is when I'm on a very gentle downward slope, and I wonder if I'd accelerate due to gravity a little faster on the XR4s. On the other hand, when I'm doing steep technical climbing in the saddle, and putting down the kind of power that made the XR4 lose traction, the DHR has never spun out.

Pros: DHR never spun out
Cons: increase in rolling resistance
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Maxxis Tires

Having ridden the XR5, XR/SE4, DHF, DHR2, Dissector the XR5 is closest to the DHR2 3C EXO. If you liked the XR5 as a front, you'll get along really well with the DHR2.

Pros: good front tire
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Maxxis Tires

Looks like the dhr2/aggressor would be the closest match looking at the tread and tread size. You could go with the slightly slower (contentious claim on here) but more common front dhf/aggressor. I prefer the dhr2 over the dhf but giving the assegai a try once trails are opened here.

Pros: prefer dhr2 over dhf
Cons: slightly slower
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
DOCorrado
Rating 5.0
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:

I have Bridgestone Potenza RE 71R tires and love them. Around town they are a bit stiff over bumps but around corners and higher speeds they are unreal traction and ride quality, Love them. I’ve never had them slide out on me and they are very sticky

Pros: unreal traction, great ride
Cons: stiff over bumps
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Maxxis Tires

I've put a couple hundred K's on mine and so far I love them. Great for street, gravel, dry dirt. The only issue I've had is the occasional wet mud on a trail. These get real squirmy in wet corners but I can't fault the tire, that's not what they're designed for.

Pros: great for street, gravel
Cons: squirmy in wet corners
Mileage: 200 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
pollaplasiein
Rating 4.0
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:

I just put four new Bridgestone Ecopia’s on my 2016 LX and I’m noticing a smoother, softer ride. Not much quieter, as I detected a bit more road noise than my last set, but I think that’s because my old tires were so worn down.

Pros: smoother, softer ride
Cons: more road noise
Vehicle: Honda Fit
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
t44tq
Rating 3.5
  • Grip:

The Bridgestone RE780 AS is another excellent tire- I'd say it's nearly as good as the Michelin, definitely better than the BFG. Where it falls down is cost- it's about the same price as the Michelin PS A/S line of all seasons and does not have the same performance. Great in the dry, great in the wet- the dry grip is not as good as the Michelin.

Pros: excellent, great in dry, great in wet
Cons: high cost, dry grip not as good as Michelin
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
yarddefender
Rating 2.0
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:

I was unfortunate to receive my GTI with a set of the RE97AS's. Rough surfaces are the worst - makes everything in the car rattle or vibrate. Dry grip is quite poor (as others have mentioned), bad breakaway even at low throttle inputs. At cruising speeds on newer highways (rubberized asphalt) everything seems fine.

Pros: fine on newer highways
Cons: poor dry grip
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
1 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 ... 111

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Comparisons
Show all

Activity feed

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake caliper ATE has only 9 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake fluid OEM Subaru has only 2 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake discs OEM Subaru has only 8 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake discs FEBI got the first review!

In the rating best shock absorbers already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!

In the rating best windshield already 14 brands participate!

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating battery for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!

The roof rack YAKIMA has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The brake pads G-brake has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The piston rings OEM Honda has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The engine radiator MISHIMOTO already has 300 votes!

The engine oil AMSOIL already has 1000 votes!

For tires GISLAVED already 25 reviews.

The tires OEM FORD already has 100 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

Loading...