vs
Tires DEBICA or GISLAVED
Debica navigator 3. Sunt mai ok iarna fata de ce no nameuri \u00eemi puneam de \"iarna\"
Pros: mai ok iarna
Debica Frigo 2, puse pe un Peugeot 107, toate 4 noi, pret decent, chiar se descurca bine pe zapada in conditiile in care stilul meu de condus este unul plictisitor si previzibil, n-am nimic de demonstrat.
Pros: pret decent, se descurca bine
Vehicle:
Peugeot 107
Eu personal pentru all season iti pot recomanda Debica: am avut in trecut si sunt decente.
Pros: decente, recomandate
BUT THEY WERE BOTH AWESOME RUBBER, AND YOU COULD DRIVE STRAIGHT UP ANYWHERE
Pros: awesome rubber, drive anywhere
Vehicle:
Saab
I've had Gislaved Nordfrost 200...My favorites were the Gislaved and will be getting new ones this year.
Pros: favorites, getting new ones
Vehicle:
Subaru Outback
For a good balance of LONG wear and good grip I've been getting Gislaved NordFrosts. Those things seriously take four winters of high mileage, mostly bare pavement commuting to wear out.
Pros: long wear, good grip, durable
Zic din experienta personala: niste cauciucuri de iarna Debica vs Michellin CrossClimate 2, prefer Debica de iarna.
Pros: prefer Debica de iarna
Am debica frigo 2, nu sunt rele, dar am mers cu mai bune. Pot spune că sunt fix de banii aia
Pros: fix de banii aia
Cons: am mers cu mai bune
Pneumatici invernali.
Beh, non necessariamente "costosi ", ma non lesinate sul prezzo per risparmiare magari 15/20€ a gomma.
Perché quando vi capita la neve seria sulla strada vi salvano la giornata.
Mi è capitato in Germania con delle gomme invernali di merda (debica) di fare un 270 in uscita da una rotonda presa piano con 2cm di neve.
Pros: salvano la giornata sulla neve
Cons: gomme invernali di merda
Cele mai proaste anvelope din via\u021ba mea au fost ni\u0219te Debica, intram foarte repede \u00een acvaplanare cu ele. A fost o u\u0219urare c\u00e2nd am sc\u0103pat de ele, de fiecare dat\u0103 c\u00e2nd era ud pe jos trebuia s\u0103 merg mai \u00eencet ca al\u021bii.
Cons: intram foarte repede \u00een acvaplanare
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads OEM Alfa Romeo got the first review!
The brake caliper OEM BMW got the first review!
The brake pads OEM Infiniti got the first review!
For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.
For battery Energizer already 25 reviews.
In the rating best water pump already 12 brands participate!
In the rating best timing belt already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!
In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating tires for Subaru Outback already 50 brands participate!
For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
Which tires to choose — DEBICA or GISLAVED?
If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare tires across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which tires are better — GISLAVED or DEBICA?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires GISLAVED were overall better than DEBICA.
- DEBICA received a PR Score of 77 out of 100, and GISLAVED scored 94 points.
- DEBICA ranked 49 in the overall ranking, and GISLAVED ranked 29.
- The average rating is higher for GISLAVED (4.6) than for DEBICA (3.5).
-
Tires GISLAVED have better feature ratings than DEBICA:
- Grip - owners believe, that this property for GISLAVED is better than DEBICA.
- Noise - drivers claim, that by this property DEBICA does not differ from GISLAVED.
- Ride comfort - reviews suggest, that this property for GISLAVED is preferred to DEBICA.
Which tires are more popular — DEBICA or GISLAVED?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires GISLAVED were overall more popular than DEBICA.
By vote balance, tires GISLAVED surpassed DEBICA:
- For DEBICA, the ratio of positive (34) to negative (10) votes is 24 votes.
- For GISLAVED, the ratio of positive (73) to negative (4) votes is 69 votes.
By number of reviews, tires GISLAVED surpassed DEBICA:
- For tires DEBICA there are 14 reviews: 10 positive, 2 neutral, 2 negative.
- For tires GISLAVED there are 25 reviews: 23 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative.
Which tires do car owners prefer — DEBICA or GISLAVED?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires DEBICA and GISLAVED have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.
Other comparisons of tires
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of tires DEBICA with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
Also available: comparisons of tires GISLAVED with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.