Tires Kumho or GISLAVED
Swapped the 21’s and summer tires off my summit reserve for 18” XDs and Kumho Venture with a 3 peak mountain snowflake rating. Had 10” of snow and didn’t bat an eye in snow mode.
Kumho - superior value and great handling.
Kumho ecsta sport S. Huge improvement
I got 275 and use to have pirellis now I got kumhos they don’t spin as much as the pirellis from a straight dig I use to fish tail hard when my foot was deep in the pedal I recommend kumhos and falkens they straight
Try kumho tires korean brand and decent quality for its price, for my sedan its about 2.8k per tire
My brother just got kumho ecsta sport a/s on his stinger and he’s very happy with them.
On my last car Michelin Pilot Sport 4S lasted ~20k but that's kind of expected due to how soft they are. On my current I have Kumho Ecsta Sport and they have lasted about the same but instead of wear being the issue they're cracking/tearing.
On my current car I drove kumho tires in the summer and they are pretty decent. Not the best I had but still pretty good.
Boils my piss when I see people walking into tyre shops and just asking for the cheapest they have. It vaporises my shit when it's clearly a family car with child seats in the back. Why would you cheap out on keeping your kids safe?
Do not get this. Tire is good enough with handling but it eas worn down to 4/32 within 25k miles. Hp71 was what i had.
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Which tires to choose — Kumho or GISLAVED?
If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare tires across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which tires are better — GISLAVED or Kumho?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Kumho were overall better than GISLAVED.
- Kumho received a PR Score of 73 out of 100, and GISLAVED scored 94 points.
- Kumho ranked 14 in the overall ranking, and GISLAVED ranked 29.
- The average rating is higher for GISLAVED (4.6) than for Kumho (3.7).
-
Tires GISLAVED have better feature ratings than Kumho:
- Noise - owners believe, that this property for GISLAVED is better than Kumho.
- Grip - drivers claim, that this property for GISLAVED is outperforms Kumho.
- Ride comfort - reviews suggest, that this property for GISLAVED is preferred to Kumho.
Which tires are more popular — Kumho or GISLAVED?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Kumho were overall more popular than GISLAVED.
By vote balance, tires Kumho surpassed GISLAVED:
- For Kumho, the ratio of positive (972) to negative (354) votes is 618 votes.
- For GISLAVED, the ratio of positive (73) to negative (4) votes is 69 votes.
By number of reviews, tires Kumho surpassed GISLAVED:
- For tires Kumho there are 421 review: 280 positive, 66 neutral, 74 negative.
- For tires GISLAVED there are 25 reviews: 23 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative.
Which tires do car owners prefer — Kumho or GISLAVED?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires Kumho led more car-specific ratings than GISLAVED:
Kumho are chosen by owners of cars such as: Volvo 850, Audi A8, Kia Sportage, and others.
Tires GISLAVED have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.
Other comparisons of tires
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of tires Kumho with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
Also available: comparisons of tires GISLAVED with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.