Tires YOKOHAMA or Kumho
Swapped the 21’s and summer tires off my summit reserve for 18” XDs and Kumho Venture with a 3 peak mountain snowflake rating. Had 10” of snow and didn’t bat an eye in snow mode.
Kumho - superior value and great handling.
Kumho ecsta sport S. Huge improvement
I got 275 and use to have pirellis now I got kumhos they don’t spin as much as the pirellis from a straight dig I use to fish tail hard when my foot was deep in the pedal I recommend kumhos and falkens they straight
Try kumho tires korean brand and decent quality for its price, for my sedan its about 2.8k per tire
My brother just got kumho ecsta sport a/s on his stinger and he’s very happy with them.
On my last car Michelin Pilot Sport 4S lasted ~20k but that's kind of expected due to how soft they are. On my current I have Kumho Ecsta Sport and they have lasted about the same but instead of wear being the issue they're cracking/tearing.
After installing the *Yokohama YK-GTX All Season* tires, there was an observable drop in mileage.
Never had a Yokohama tire last more than 30k miles on three different vehicles, so I won’t be buying them again.
Boils my piss when I see people walking into tyre shops and just asking for the cheapest they have. It vaporises my shit when it's clearly a family car with child seats in the back. Why would you cheap out on keeping your kids safe?
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Which tires to choose — YOKOHAMA or Kumho?
If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare tires across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which tires are better — Kumho or YOKOHAMA?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires YOKOHAMA were overall better than Kumho.
- YOKOHAMA received a PR Score of 82 out of 100, and Kumho scored 73 points.
- YOKOHAMA ranked 6 in the overall ranking, and Kumho ranked 14.
- The average rating is higher for YOKOHAMA (4) than for Kumho (3.7).
-
Tires YOKOHAMA have better feature ratings than Kumho:
- Grip - owners believe, that this property for YOKOHAMA is better than Kumho.
- Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for YOKOHAMA is outperforms Kumho.
- Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for Kumho is preferred to YOKOHAMA.
Which tires are more popular — YOKOHAMA or Kumho?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires YOKOHAMA were overall more popular than Kumho.
By vote balance, tires YOKOHAMA surpassed Kumho:
- For YOKOHAMA, the ratio of positive (1371) to negative (288) votes is 1083 votes.
- For Kumho, the ratio of positive (972) to negative (354) votes is 618 votes.
By number of reviews, tires YOKOHAMA surpassed Kumho:
- For tires YOKOHAMA there are 539 reviews: 429 positive, 42 neutral, 68 negative.
- For tires Kumho there are 421 review: 280 positive, 66 neutral, 74 negative.
Which tires do car owners prefer — YOKOHAMA or Kumho?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires YOKOHAMA led more car-specific ratings than Kumho:
YOKOHAMA are chosen by owners of cars such as: BMW M2, Dodge Dakota, Porsche Cayenne, Skoda Octavia, Suzuki Swift, Jeep Compass, Nissan Pathfinder, Toyota Celica, Toyota Fortuner, Toyota MR2, Volkswagen Beetle, and others.
Kumho are chosen by owners of cars such as: Volvo 850, Audi A8, Kia Sportage, and others.
Other comparisons of tires
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of tires YOKOHAMA with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, Toyo, Cooper.
Also available: comparisons of tires Kumho with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, Toyo, Cooper.
You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.