vs
Tires OEM Mazda or COMFORSER
Ive got a cx50, live in Tahoe where it snows plenty, and with all weather tires, this thing is a beast.
Pros: this thing is a beast
Vehicle:
Mazda
I got a Mazda 2 with good winter tires , I'm in Calgary. It costs me almost nothing on gas, and I finish the week with way more money in my pocket. in my 40 years of life I've learned a FWD car with decent rubber will handle winter good as any suv.
Pros: good rubber, handles winter
Vehicle:
Mazda 2
I commuted 100 miles a day in my CX5 in snowy Maine. I had a 6speed manual transmission and snow tires and never had a problem.
Pros: no problems in snow
Vehicle:
Mazda
I also swapped the stock tires for A/T tires, mostly for the looks, but they actually helped in sand and rough surfaces.
Pros: helped in sand
Vehicle:
Mazda
Comforser are well-known tires and they offer great traction and performance. Comforser off-road tires can easily handle deep muddy terrains and manage to maintain forward motion at all times. On the other hand, this tire brand is a little bit noisy, but they are great for highway use. Being manufactured in China, Comforser Tyres can offer the latest tyre technology which improves longevity, fuel consumption and performance in both wet and dry road conditions.
Pros: great traction, performance
Cons: a little noisy
Id suggest learning ro drive better honestly. Comforser tyres are made in China by a Canadian company and are extremely reliable and cost effective.
Independently tested they are quieter than most and have excellent rating in wet conditions. We fit Comforser CF1100 on our landrover and they perform better than most other tyres in the most challenging conditions.
Pros: reliable and cost effective
Vehicle:
Land Rover
Ive got comforser 1100’s on the truck they are pretty common around here.good in snow and mud, they are ok on the highway I’ve put 75000km on them and am only about halfway through their lifespan and average 9.2l/100 (~26mpg.)with the babydiesel going about 130-140km/h (80-90mph) the biggest issue is they have to be rotated every oil change and aren’t as good as more expensive options in the rain.
Pros: good in snow and mud
Cons: not good in rain
Mileage: 75000 km
Year old post I know, but a couple days ago my grandpa took my car to go get only my spare tyre changed, I come back from work and I see a pair of Comforser Cf510s on my VT Commodore. Didn’t think they could be THIS bad in the wet, I genuinely can’t even accelerate slightly faster than usual, my wheels just spin uncontrollably.
Cons: bad in the wet
stock tires are garbage awd turbo here. New tires bring it alive much better confidence in the hard corners and way better in the wet
Pros: better confidence, better in wet
Cons: stock tires are garbage
Vehicle:
Mazda 3
Yes, they’re cheap, and yes they hold on well enough in the dry and make the fun 1970s police chase tyre squeal noise, but when there is even the slightest moisture on the road, and I mean just a bit of damp or drizzle, they lose ALL grip. They are genuinely dangerous and should not be for sale anywhere that rains.
Pros: fun tyre squeal noise
Cons: lose ALL grip
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads NIPPARTS got the first review!
The brake discs Hella got the first review!
The brake discs OEM Suzuki got the first review!
For tires OEM Toyota already 25 reviews.
For tires IRONMAN already 25 reviews.
For starter motor OEM Volkswagen already 25 reviews.
In the rating best ignition coil already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!
In the rating best turbocharger already 4 brands participate!
In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for BMW M2 already 5 brands participate!
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
