vs
Tires OEM Toyota or IRONMAN
Reviews
Fwd with snow tires in the winter isnt a bad option. You can't win every battle but itl do for 99% if the driving. I live in northern WI and we drive all over the place with Prius' and snow tires no problem.
Pros: not a bad option
Vehicle:
Toyota Prius
I'm in ironman gen 2 from tire discounters all 4, i got all the tires and the mount and a alignment and balancing for like 400$ bucks with the deal they run. And a free oil change. But the ironmans have done me well they did good in rain and snow and i haven't exactly been nice to them, handled potholes too.
Pros: good in rain and snow
Used to do this and more, regularly, in a 4wd Tundra with Blizzaks. Was unstoppable.
Pros: was unstoppable
Vehicle:
Toyota Tundra
I've driven my 2012 Camry for about 60k miles and the only maintenance I've needed routine. Tires/brakes/oil/etc...
Pros: routine maintenance only
Vehicle:
Toyota Camry
Mileage: 96560 km
Yeah holes in the tyres generally aren\u2019t great for holding pressure! That tyre is a long way past dead, it needs changing ASAP, i personally wouldn\u2019t trust it for driving at any speed.
Cons: tyre past dead
Vehicle:
Toyota MR2
I recently went from FWD Toyota with good tires too AWD Subaru with good tires and there is no comparison. With my FWD in the snow I would regularly lose traction in corners at very low speed, sub 5 mph going around city streets. I could not start driving on a hill if there was snow or ice.
Pros: good tires, no comparison
Cons: lose traction in corners
Vehicle:
Toyota
Ironman and milemaker are the last two sets and they lasted about 75% of what a premium brand would.
Cons: shorter lifespan
Ironman is a value line. They are not awful, also not outstanding. Wet traction and winter traction are not gonna be their strength.
Cons: poor wet, winter traction
Yes the size choice is criminal and the OEM trailer tires even worse. Come on Toyota.
Cons: OEM trailer tires worse
Vehicle:
Toyota Land Cruiser
This tire is new Iron Man. This is the second chunk missing; the other tire was replaced under warranty. It’s new, maybe 2 months old.
Cons: chunks missing, warranty replacement
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads NIPPARTS got the first review!
The brake discs Hella got the first review!
The brake discs OEM Suzuki got the first review!
For tires OEM Toyota already 25 reviews.
For tires IRONMAN already 25 reviews.
For starter motor OEM Volkswagen already 25 reviews.
In the rating best ignition coil already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!
In the rating best turbocharger already 4 brands participate!
In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for BMW M2 already 5 brands participate!
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
Which tires to choose — OEM Toyota or IRONMAN?
If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare tires across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which tires are better — IRONMAN or OEM Toyota?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires OEM Toyota were overall better than IRONMAN.
- OEM Toyota received a PR Score of 76 out of 100, and IRONMAN scored 66 points.
- OEM Toyota ranked 35 in the overall ranking, and IRONMAN ranked 39.
- The average rating based on reviews is the same for OEM Toyota (3.9) and IRONMAN (3.2).
-
Tires OEM Toyota have better feature ratings than IRONMAN:
- Grip - owners believe, that this property for OEM Toyota is better than IRONMAN.
- Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for OEM Toyota is outperforms IRONMAN.
- Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for IRONMAN is preferred to OEM Toyota.
Which tires are more popular — OEM Toyota or IRONMAN?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires IRONMAN were overall more popular than IRONMAN.
By vote balance, tires OEM Toyota surpassed IRONMAN:
- For OEM Toyota, the ratio of positive (61) to negative (19) votes is 42 votes.
- For IRONMAN, the ratio of positive (54) to negative (27) votes is 27 votes.
By number of reviews, the manufacturers are equal:
- For tires OEM Toyota there are 25 reviews: 17 positive, 5 neutral, 3 negative.
- For tires IRONMAN there are 25 reviews: 14 positive, 6 neutral, 5 negative.
Which tires do car owners prefer — OEM Toyota or IRONMAN?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires OEM Toyota and IRONMAN have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.
Other comparisons of tires
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of tires OEM Toyota with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
Also available: comparisons of tires IRONMAN with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.