vs
Tires Tesla or DEBICA
volevo solo condividere i consumi della model 3 che ho acquistato recentemente usata. Il viaggio B comprende anche circa 170km di autostrada fatta in piemonte, a circa 5 gradi esterni. La versione è dual motor, e monta le gomme invernali. Per il tragitto che faccio io normalmente per andare a lavoro, si sta già rivelando perfetta. 141 wh/km di inverno e con le gomme invernali, non oso immaginare appena arriverà la primavera come scenderanno i consumi! Oltretutto, la macchina a 135k km ma sembra nuova, un degrado della batteria del 6/7% e interni perfetti.
Pros: interni perfetti, consumi irrisori
Mileage: 135000 km
Debica navigator 3. Sunt mai ok iarna fata de ce no nameuri \u00eemi puneam de \"iarna\"
Pros: mai ok iarna
Debica Frigo 2, puse pe un Peugeot 107, toate 4 noi, pret decent, chiar se descurca bine pe zapada in conditiile in care stilul meu de condus este unul plictisitor si previzibil, n-am nimic de demonstrat.
Pros: pret decent, se descurca bine
Vehicle:
Peugeot 107
Eu personal pentru all season iti pot recomanda Debica: am avut in trecut si sunt decente.
Pros: decente, recomandate
I don't think savings should be the main driver to get a Tesla. A lot of things can influence if you save money or not compared to an ICE car. In my case...yes. Insurance costs vary by a ton of factors. Where I live insurance is paid annually and mine is $1500 for a full cover, which is like $125 a month. More than your average ICE car, that pays about $800 yearly. However I've saved money in every other aspect. I have solar so I charge for free. And the only maintenance I've paid were $15 to a local tire shop to rotate my tires and 2 gallons of wiper fluid.
Pros: saved money
Cons: higher insurance
Am debica frigo 2, nu sunt rele, dar am mers cu mai bune. Pot spune că sunt fix de banii aia
Pros: fix de banii aia
Cons: am mers cu mai bune
Mine are around 3.5/32 and 4.5/32 with 35k miles. Probably going to change them in a few thousands more.
Pros: good mileage
Cons: low thread depth
Mileage: 35000 km
Funny to clown on ugly truck, but you can see the 4wd system doing its thing. This comes down to shitty tires. Put some good ATs on that thing and it would crawl right out.
Pros: 4WD system works
Cons: shitty tires
Cyber truck tires need to be replaced every 6,000 miles due to the sheer weight of the vehicle, and if you don't then they get super smoothed out. So they become useless in snow
Cons: short lifespan, useless in snow
Mileage: 6000 km
I also need new tires at 3 years and 28,000 miles because of excess wear on the inside of my tires. Get an alignment as soon as you get it.
Cons: excess tire wear
Mileage: 45061 km
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads OEM Alfa Romeo got the first review!
The brake caliper OEM BMW got the first review!
The brake pads OEM Infiniti got the first review!
For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.
For battery Energizer already 25 reviews.
In the rating best water pump already 12 brands participate!
In the rating best timing belt already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!
In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating tires for Subaru Outback already 50 brands participate!
For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
Which tires to choose — Tesla or DEBICA?
If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare tires across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which tires are better — DEBICA or Tesla?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Tesla were overall better than DEBICA.
- Tesla received a PR Score of 64 out of 100, and DEBICA scored 77 points.
- Tesla ranked 38 in the overall ranking, and DEBICA ranked 49.
- The average rating is higher for DEBICA (3.5) than for DEBICA (3.5).
Which tires are more popular — Tesla or DEBICA?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Tesla were overall more popular than DEBICA.
By vote balance, tires Tesla surpassed DEBICA:
- For Tesla, the ratio of positive (74) to negative (41) votes is 33 votes.
- For DEBICA, the ratio of positive (34) to negative (10) votes is 24 votes.
By number of reviews, tires Tesla surpassed DEBICA:
- For tires Tesla there are 37 reviews: 22 positive, 4 neutral, 11 negative.
- For tires DEBICA there are 14 reviews: 10 positive, 2 neutral, 2 negative.
Which tires do car owners prefer — Tesla or DEBICA?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires Tesla and DEBICA have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.
Other comparisons of tires
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of tires Tesla with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
Also available: comparisons of tires DEBICA with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.