Tires YOKOHAMA or KENDA
Yokohoma Geolander X-AT. I've had them on a bunch of different vehicles.
Kenda Kiniptions on my main city commuter. No problems.
I decided to replace the stock tires on my Radwagon 4 EU with motorcycle tires. Here are some pros, cons, and thoughts. The Kenda's provide a much sturdier ride feel vs the stock tires. I found the stocks were bouncy and balloony, like the bike was on leaf springs. Super annoying. The Kenda tires are stiffer, eliminates cartoonish bounce, and ride feels smoother and secure.
I'm still running the geolandars on my wilderness. So far I love them no issues at all. Wprked great in the snow this winter and so far so good running them aired down on fire roads and some riverbeds etc. Not to mention quiet and smooth on road
With only a few hundred miles on them my experience has been very good with the Yokohama Advans. They are very nimble and have almost instant feedback when cornering, a big plus for me. Fairly quiet at highway speeds, and only slightly harsh.
I’ve been running 37” g003s for 12000 miles lots of highway and they are amazing. No issues on anything. Granted they are pricey as hell but wear pretty evenly and slowly. On pace for 55000 or miles with current wear.
I have the Yokohama X-ATs. Love them, have 50K miles on them and they're still have a decent amount of tread left. Quieter than I expected and no complaints off road so far.
Yokohamas would get my vote, theyre decent tires and the price reflects such. But i would also suggest Michelin or Continental offerings.
I’ve only had snows on my Crosstreks, but have driven on snow with stock tires with a friends Crosstrek. I live in an area that gets about 220 inches of snow a year, plus shoulder seasons of slush and ice. This is how I’d rank them-
Better- Crosstrek on stock- ok
I was a little disappointed with the icy road performance of the Yokohama AVID GT that came on mine.
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.