Tires YOKOHAMA or Kumho

Filter

Part:

Tires
Back
  • loading...

Manufacturer:

All
Back
  • loading...

Make:

Select make
Back
  • loading...

Generation:

Select generation
  • Vectra
  • Mokka
  • Antara
  • Astra
  • SPORTS TOURER
  • Meriva
  • Zafira Tourer
Review tone
Reviews found: 0
Kumho Tires
jthomp
Rating 4.0
  • Noise:

The set I have now are the Kumho Ecsta ASX's and have lasted me over years. Could have gone longer but my alignment I think is shot and they are worn funny/cupped and make some road noise. I think I spent something like 90 bux a tire and am very happy with it.

Pros: lasted over years, very happy
Cons: worn funny, make road noise
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
nickthaskater
Rating 4.0
  • Grip:
  • Noise:

I like Yokohama's approach: In regards to handling, the tires were not destined for track duty, so we experienced a level of performance that was slightly above the standard OE tire on most modern passenger vehicles. A few of us did the sentiment that the tire did improve its ability to stay planted after a few hot laps, which would give credence to Yokohama\u2019s claim that the special compound will change its handling characteristics for the better when driven aggressively.

Pros: improved ability to stay planted
Cons: not destined for track duty
Vehicle: MINI
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Kumho Tires

i run about 28-30 psi in my kumho ecsta mx in the same size. any more and they have accelerated wear in the center of the tire.

Pros: good pressure 28-30 psi
Cons: accelerated wear in center
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Kumho Tires

on my Golf with only Koni Sport adjustable dampers and Kumho XS tires, I regularly set faster autocross times than many of the \"darling\" cars in faster classes in my local autocross events

Pros: faster autocross times
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Kumho Tires

Try the Kumho ASX. They were quieter than any other tire I've tried. Much more so than the awful Goodyear RS-As.

Pros: quieter than other tires
Cons: awful Goodyear RS-As
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

I got em... I don't beat on them though. I don't have them stretched or anything, just OEM tire size 205/50 on my Speedlines. They look good. Water performance is scary if you do anything stupid, drive like a normal human being (your findings may vary...). Other then that, they are a really great tire for daily driver use. I've had mine on... I want to say 15k miles. I need to rotate them though.

Pros: great tire for daily driver
Cons: scary water performance
Mileage: 24140 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Kumho Tires

I ran the Kumho XS (250/50 15 on a 2006 Mazda 2) last summer and found them to be fairly comparable to the superceded Bridgestone RE01R, albeit much cheaper. I did 4-5 autocross sessions on them on top of 'spirited' drives in the local mountains every weekend. My fronts lasted just under 3000 miles to slick and the rears around double that, but I do have a fairly aggressive alignment.

Pros: fairly comparable, much cheaper
Cons: fronts lasted under 3000 miles
Vehicle: Mazda 2
Mileage: 4828 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
DrFraserCrane
Rating 4.0
  • Grip:
  • Noise:

I ran s.drives on my mk5 for a little while (ended up getting rid of them because some jackass at the tire place used the wrong wheels weights and the tires cupped badly) I was pretty happy with them, stuck well, not too loud (but had some noise for sure), and decently priced.

Pros: stuck well, decently priced
Cons: some noise
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

My all-season tires however, and worn for the path. They are still drivable, but I will definitely be replacing tires before winter.

Pros: still drivable
Cons: worn for the path
Part number: AVS DB S2
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
Widman
Rating 2.0
  • Grip:
  • Noise:

I would suggest staying away from the Yokohama Advan ST. I have the 285-14-19s on my egg and while a great handling and traction tire, after 7K miles they are cupping and I get a low speed noise and vibration to the point that at 8K I am replacing them

Pros: great handling, good traction
Cons: cupping, low speed noise
Mileage: 7000 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
1 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 ... 96

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Comparisons
Show all

Activity feed

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake caliper ATE has only 9 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The ball joint OEM Volvo has only 2 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake caliper Raybestos has only 9 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The tires OEM Fiat got the first review!

The ABS unit OEM FORD got the first review!

For tires GISLAVED already 25 reviews.

In the rating best cabin filter already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best shock absorbers already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

In the auto rating shock absorbers for Ford Ranger already 20 brands participate!

In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating tires for Toyota Corolla already 50 brands participate!

The leaf springs Dobinsons has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The manual transmission OEM FORD has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The control arm OEM Toyota has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The brake pads OEM Subaru already has 250 votes!

The engine radiator MISHIMOTO already has 300 votes!

For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.

The tires OEM FORD already has 100 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

Loading...