Wiper blades Trico or ANCO

Filter

Part:

Wiper blades
Back
  • loading...

Manufacturer:

All
Back
  • loading...

Make:

Select make
Back
  • loading...

Generation:

Select generation
  • Vectra
  • Mokka
  • Antara
  • Astra
  • SPORTS TOURER
  • Meriva
  • Zafira Tourer
Review tone
Reviews found: 0
Trico Wiper blades
ImposterBk
Rating 4.5
  • Wipe quality:

I've since switched to Trico Force, and I've been very happy with them. They work great and last me between 18 and 24 months.

Pros: work great, long lasting
Vehicle: Kia
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Trico Wiper blades
FuturesPassed
Rating 4.0
  • Wipe quality:
  • Streaks/chatter:

At 5,000 miles I replaced the factory 4Runner blades with Trico Neoform beam blades (a B grade wiper in my book) and they still perform like brand new blades 10,000 miles later, including having been in the Florida heat followed by Connecticut ice, snow, and salt slurry.

Pros: perform like new, durable
Vehicle: Toyota 4runner
Mileage: 10000 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Trico Wiper blades

The Trico Classic series wiper blades look and fit just like the original 1970’s/1980’s blades without need for the adapter piece. I have a set on my 1975 GMC C25 and the other squarebody owners I meet always ask about my wiper blades lol.

Pros: look and fit original
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Trico Wiper blades

I just did it myself with a slightly different spin: I found a slightly better looking wiper blade part on the "TRICO Force" that tucks nicely over the stock window molding. Looks more like an air-foil:

Pros: better looking, airfoil shape
Cons: wind effect not eliminated
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
ANCO Wiper blades
helocast63
Rating 2.0
  • Wipe quality:
  • Streaks/chatter:

I have Anco wiper blades, which I previously recommended as a great deal on Amazon.com, both for price and because they attach directly, with no plastic adapter hardware needed. At speeds between 70-80mph, both wipers left areas of no-contact with the windshield, worse on the passenger side.

Pros: attach directly, no adapter needed
Cons: areas of no-contact at speed
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Comparisons
Show all

Activity feed

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake caliper ATE has only 9 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The ball joint OEM Volvo has only 2 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake caliper Raybestos has only 9 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The tires OEM Fiat got the first review!

The ABS unit OEM FORD got the first review!

For tires GISLAVED already 25 reviews.

In the rating best cabin filter already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best shock absorbers already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

In the auto rating shock absorbers for Ford Ranger already 20 brands participate!

In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating tires for Toyota Corolla already 50 brands participate!

The leaf springs Dobinsons has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The manual transmission OEM FORD has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The control arm OEM Toyota has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The brake pads OEM Subaru already has 250 votes!

The engine radiator MISHIMOTO already has 300 votes!

For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.

The tires OEM FORD already has 100 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

Loading...