Reviews of Kumho tires

PR Score ?

Based on 421 review and 1326 votes

1326 votes

Average rating ?

3.7

Ride comfort:

3.4

Noise:

3.9

Grip:

3.5

280

421 review

Description

Kumho

South Korea

No.14 in the rating

among 66 manufacturers

Share on social networks:

Part:

Back

Manufacturer:

Back

Make:

Back

Model:

Back

Generation:

Review tone

Positive Negative Neutral

Reviews found: 0

Reviews

Relevant

New

Helpful

Kumho › Tires

93rdp 7 May 2025, 09:32

Rating 5.0

Grip:

Am avut KUMHO ECSTA PS71 205/60/16 (de vara) timp de 3 sezoane pe masina si am fost foarte multumit de ele, modelul asta pe 16” tin minte ca statea bine pe teste, m-am documentat destul de mult cand le-am luat.

Am trecut anul trecut la jante pe 17” si am luat tot Kumho, de data asta all season SOLUS 4A HA32+ (225/50/17). Desi nu am fost niciodata fan all season, am ajuns sa fac maxim 10k km pe an cu masina si dupa ultimele ierni am ajuns la concluzia ca bataia de cap e prea mare cu doua seturi separate. Le am din august pe masina si sunt tare multumit si de astea.

Pros: foarte multumit de ele

Vehicle: BMW

Kumho › Tires

nycukiss 7 May 2025, 07:55

Rating 4.0

Grip:

Am avut kumho ecsta ps71, si au fost ok timp de 3 ani.

Pros: ok timp de 3 ani

Kumho › Tires

Solid_Woodpecker640 7 May 2025, 07:43

Rating 5.0

Grip:

Folosesc Kumho de ani buni. Extrem de mulțumit! Recomand!

Pros: extrem de mulțumit

Kumho › Tires

Kenpachi-is-bae 7 May 2025, 06:58

Rating 3.5

Grip:
Ride comfort:

eu tot timpul am avut ca buget ~350lei pe o anvelopa ca am masina de o tona si un scuipat si in ultimii 5 ani am luat doar kumho

Primul model a fost kumho ecsta hm si au tinut super bine, le am si vandut dupa 3 ani la 350 toate 4

Acum 2 ani am luat kumho ps71 si s au uzat mult mai repede decat celalalte

Pros: ecsta hm tinut super bine

Cons: ps71 uzat mai repede

Kumho › Tires

StinklePink 5 May 2025, 17:31

Rating 4.0

Grip:
Ride comfort:

Just bought these as I was in the market. I like them. A little more firm of a ride but not terrible. Price was right and I am KUMHO fan and that is who makes these for Discount. In summary if money is an object, good value and I would recommend.

Pros: good value, price right

Cons: more firm of a ride

Kumho › Tires

TraditionalAd3210 30 Apr 2025, 23:47

Rating 4.0

Kumho is a well built tire from Korea.

Pros: well built tire

Kumho › Tires

PerformerAwkward9794 30 Apr 2025, 18:58

Rating 1.0

Grip:

In my opinion Kumho tires are not a good option, they are not cheap and not very good either. Mines started coming apart at 24.000 miles in a brand new Audi Q5.

Cons: not cheap, not good

Vehicle: Audi Q5

Mileage: 38624 km

Kumho › Tires

acejavelin69 28 Apr 2025, 13:46

Rating 4.0

the Kumho TA51 (assuming TA51a as it is the current production) is a well reviewed and tested very low rolling resistance tire, thanks to a silica-enhanced tread compound. Most reviewers and owners over time generally note a small INCREASE in fuel economy of 1-3 MPG.

Pros: low rolling resistance

Kumho › Tires

mjohnson1971 22 Apr 2025, 15:26

Rating 4.0

Grip:

I had two sets of the Kumho Crugen HT51 SL. I liked both times and they lasted about 40,000 miles each. Seemed low but they're snow rated so I know those don't get as many miles because the rubber is softer. They handled great in snow/sleet/ice and enabled my front wheel drive van to go through lots of winter weather driving.

This last set (third owned) pissed me off though and barely made it 18,000 miles even with proper inflation and alignment.

Pros: handled great in snow

Cons: low mileage, rubber softer

Vehicle: Toyota Sienna

Mileage: 64373 km