Brake pads Akebono or OEM Subaru

Filter

Part:

Brake pads
Back
  • loading...

Manufacturer:

All
Back
  • loading...

Make:

Select make
Back
  • loading...

Generation:

Select generation
  • Vectra
  • Mokka
  • Antara
  • Astra
  • SPORTS TOURER
  • Meriva
  • Zafira Tourer
Review tone
Reviews found: 0
Akebono Brake pads
goodvibes
Rating 5.0
  • Braking:
  • Noise:

I highly recommend akebono euro brake pads, especially on DSG cars to remove the grabbiness at low speed. Great cheap upgrade for new car.

Pros: remove grabbiness, cheap upgrade
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Akebono Brake pads
KevinC
Rating 4.0
  • Braking:
  • Dust:

I ran Akebono pads on my ZHP coupe and they were great. Slightly less initial bite than stock, requiring a slightly firmer foot on the pedal, and also need to warm up a bit for full grip - but beyond that, clean as a whistle and they wear forever.

Pros: clean, wear forever
Cons: less initial bite, need warm up
Vehicle: BMW
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Akebono Brake pads
shank3r
Rating 5.0
  • Braking:
  • Dust:

Centric rotors are typically good quality. A few years back I started using Akebono pads (after trying brands such as EBC & Hawk). I don’t think I’ll ever buy anything other than Akebono pads anymore, they stop amazingly well and have less dust than previously mentioned pads.

Pros: amazing stopping power, low dust
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Akebono Brake pads

I had an issue with the inner pads sticking on my Golf (same as A3 platform), but when I took apart the caliper and cleaned/regreased all the caliper pins the problem went away. If you've already done that, I really have no idea what it could be. It's definitely not normal though. What pads/rotors are you using? I've been using the Akebono's and they are great. Very little wear and dust.

Pros: great, very little wear and dust
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Akebono Brake pads
keazeone
Rating 4.0
  • Braking:
  • Dust:

I run them on my 03 325xi. So much better on break dust. They don't have as much bite as the OEM pads, but I think they're super close.

Pros: less brake dust
Cons: less bite than OEM
Vehicle: BMW
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
OEM Subaru Brake pads
downytide
Rating 3.0
  • Braking:

I had an 2017 Outback 2.5, had it since April of 2017 until last week, during that time I put on 93k km on it. I wish I had gotten the 3.6, I got the 2.5 hoping to save fuel, my average was around 25mpg for lifetime, and I drive a lot on hwy and country road, I never once was able to hit the 30mpg even if it's just me in the car and driving 50mph on the country road, this part I really feel like Subaru should correct their mpg reading, in winter it can get as bad as 18mpg in the freezing weather, as when it's cold the transmission will make the engine constantly rev at higher to warm it up, the 2.5 is also not a smooth engine when at idle, I had a vibration issue that was deemed normal. Overall, it's a reliable car, but its not a durable car, another thing is, when taking off quickly from a stop, it can really bog down, most people are used to first gear and just boot, but these CVT don't have first gear and it can be rather unexpected, I've almost got hit from behind a couple times from that. The eyesight is a good feature, the lane departure can be annoying at times but I was ok with it, these cars have an issue with windshield chipping, and if the car has eyesight, the windshield need to be a specific one and then the eyesight needs to be re-calibrated, this happened to me TWICE, and it got expensive very quick. OEM tires are lousy, by lousy I mean it doesn't even get good mpg, doesn't get good grip in ANY condition and puncture easily if you take it to any sort of gravel road, I had puncture the tire within 1200km, I just got some decent A/T tires after, no problem for the last 90k. The brakes are soft, so first thing I did was changed the pads.

Pros: reliable car, eyesight is good
Cons: windshield chipping, brakes are soft
Mileage: 93000 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
1 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 ... 52

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Comparisons
Show all

Activity feed

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake caliper ATE has only 9 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The ball joint OEM Volvo has only 2 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake caliper Raybestos has only 9 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The tires OEM Fiat got the first review!

The ABS unit OEM FORD got the first review!

For tires GISLAVED already 25 reviews.

In the rating best cabin filter already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best shock absorbers already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

In the auto rating shock absorbers for Ford Ranger already 20 brands participate!

In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating tires for Toyota Corolla already 50 brands participate!

The leaf springs Dobinsons has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The manual transmission OEM FORD has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The control arm OEM Toyota has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The brake pads OEM Subaru already has 250 votes!

The engine radiator MISHIMOTO already has 300 votes!

For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.

The tires OEM FORD already has 100 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

Loading...