Brake pads ATE or OEM Audi

Filter

Part:

Brake pads
Back
  • loading...

Manufacturer:

All
Back
  • loading...

Make:

Select make
Back
  • loading...

Generation:

Select generation
  • Vectra
  • Mokka
  • Antara
  • Astra
  • SPORTS TOURER
  • Meriva
  • Zafira Tourer
Review tone
Reviews found: 0
ATE Brake pads
lewj213V2
Rating 5.0
  • Braking:

ATE Ceramic pads and ATE disks are my go to because they are OEM, but a little extra performance on top. Zero complaints at all from me and they are quite reasonable price wise too

Pros: good performance, reasonable price
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
ATE Brake pads
benough
Rating 4.5
  • Braking:
  • Dust:

ATE make low dust pads that don’t need warming up like previous ceramic pads. I have them on my MK5 and they are great. Don’t have that annoying instant bite that stock pads do. Also they go forever

Pros: low dust, long lasting
Cons: no instant bite
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
ATE Brake pads
TCArgh
Rating 4.0
  • Braking:
  • Dust:

Using ATE rotors and ceramic pads on my mk6. Very little dust. Still has very good bite compared to other standard OEM pads.

Pros: very little dust, good bite
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
OEM Audi Brake pads

The rear brake wear on the B9 SQ5 is a known thing. The programming for stability control is super aggressive on applying the rear brakes on turns to keep the rear of the car planted so the rear pads wear down fast if you are even just a moderately spirited driver. The rear pads on my SQ5 only lasted 17k before reaching 2mm

Pros: aggressive stability control
Cons: rear pads wear fast
Vehicle: Audi SQ5
Mileage: 17000 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
ATE Brake pads
SM0GGI
Rating 4.0
  • Braking:

I don't believe you lose cold temperature bite with good OEM replacement ceramic pads like from ATE.

Pros: good cold bite
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
ATE Brake pads

Get ATE or Textar pads, buying more known pads because they are "performance brakes (which you see at the register)" is basically throwing money away just because "they are expensive so they must be better" and is idiotic imo.

Pros: good value, reliable
Cons: expensive alternatives
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
OEM Audi Brake pads
rtnlsltn
Rating 1.0
  • Braking:
  • Dust:

As someone who has a TTRS, the brakes blow. Heavy, overheat, poor feel, and expensive rotors/pads.

Cons: heavy, overheat, poor feel
Vehicle: Audi
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Comparisons
Show all

Activity feed

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake pads Motorcraft has only 4 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake fluid OEM Subaru has only 2 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake pads Detroit Axle has only 8 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake caliper OEM BMW got the first review!

For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.

For battery Energizer already 25 reviews.

In the rating best water pump already 12 brands participate!

In the rating best timing belt already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!

In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!

In the auto rating tires for Subaru Outback already 50 brands participate!

The glow plug Autolite has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The fender OEM Volkswagen has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The brake discs Tesla has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

The brake pads OEM Subaru already has 250 votes!

The engine oil AMSOIL already has 1000 votes!

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

The engine radiator MISHIMOTO already has 300 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

Loading...