Brake pads Hawk Performance or Tesla

Filter

Part:

Brake pads
Back
  • loading...

Manufacturer:

All
Back
  • loading...

Make:

Select make
Back
  • loading...

Generation:

Select generation
  • Vectra
  • Mokka
  • Antara
  • Astra
  • SPORTS TOURER
  • Meriva
  • Zafira Tourer
Review tone
Reviews found: 0
Hawk Performance Brake pads
Krazee
Rating 4.0
  • Braking:

I would recommend the TT brakes. Choose plain rotors if you are wary of drilled or slotted rotors, but those brakes with hawk pads (or something more appressive) should be fine. The added lever arm does help substantially, as well as the larger piston over stock.

Pros: added lever arm, larger piston
Vehicle: Audi TT
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
Banditt007
Rating 4.0
  • Braking:

You will also find the HAWK HPS pads to be nice, however they do get more grabby after a few stops once they get some heat into them being that they are a middle of the road performance street pad. The HPS's will never be as grabby/difficult to modulate as the ultimate ceramics/stock pads though.

Pros: good for modulation, decent price
Cons: grabby after stops
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads

I'm running the ECS Stage 2v2 front and 1R rear BBKs, with Hawk HP+ in the front and HPS in the rear. I am running Pentosin Racing brake fluid. I have yet to experience fade on the track running this set-up

Pros: no fade on track
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
collins_tc
Rating 4.0
  • Braking:
  • Dust:

HPS: For me, an excellent daily driver pad. My only issue with them is in rain they seem to take some time to "burn off" water, so initially, your stopping distance is increased. Once you warm up the rotors, the pads are fine. This may be exacerbated by the fact that I run the ECS 2v2 front brakes and by their very properties, they tend to run cool. As for initial bite in the cold, I can say these are quite good. I feel that they are a great compromise between preformance and low dust (I've never had a problem with these being dusty).

Pros: excellent daily driver pad, good initial cold bite, low dust
Cons: increased stopping distance in rain
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
aaonms
Rating 4.5
  • Braking:
  • Dust:

On my 20th, I swapped to Hawk HPS within a couple of months of having the car. Now, after 40K miles on the pads, I find that they dust considerably less than stock, stop at least as well as OEM, and work well when cold.

Pros: dust considerably less, work well when cold
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 64374 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
dcomiskey
Rating 5.0
  • Braking:
  • Dust:

I've had HPS' on my car for two years and I can say quite certainly what you say is SO not true. They are def. low dust and have performed quote well for me at umerous track events and are EXCELLENT on the street.

Pros: definitely low dust, excellent on the street
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
Racer_X
Rating 3.0
  • Braking:
  • Dust:

You would get far, far better brake performance from Hawk HPS or EBC Green pads on flat, OEM replacement rotors. Those decorative rotors might look kind of cool, but they won't stop you any shorter, and could extend your stopping distance some. (Actually, to someone who understands the engineering of brake systems, rotors like those look really stupid.) And Mintex Red Box is a decent OEM quality pad with low dust, but they aren't very fade resistant and they aren't very grippy. They are comparable to stock or parts store house brand pads in performance, just less dusty.

Pros: better performance with Hawk/EBC pads
Cons: decorative rotors don't stop shorter, Mintex fade resistant, not grippy
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
dcomiskey
Rating 2.0
  • Braking:
  • Dust:

my HPS are now cooked after my track events. They're also getting noticeably more dusty, too. I'm going to be getting better pads before my next event. My last trip to Limerock, they were fading bad after only a lap. But, they held up for a long time before that.

Pros: held up for a long time
Cons: cooked after track events, getting more dusty, fading bad
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Comparisons
Show all

Activity feed

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake caliper ATE has only 9 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The ball joint OEM Volvo has only 2 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake caliper Raybestos has only 9 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The tires OEM Fiat got the first review!

The ABS unit OEM FORD got the first review!

For tires GISLAVED already 25 reviews.

In the rating best cabin filter already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best shock absorbers already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

In the auto rating shock absorbers for Ford Ranger already 20 brands participate!

In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating tires for Toyota Corolla already 50 brands participate!

The leaf springs Dobinsons has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The manual transmission OEM FORD has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The control arm OEM Toyota has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The brake pads OEM Subaru already has 250 votes!

The engine radiator MISHIMOTO already has 300 votes!

For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.

The tires OEM FORD already has 100 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

Loading...