Brake pads Hawk Performance or WILWOOD

Filter

Part:

Brake pads
Back
  • loading...

Manufacturer:

All
Back
  • loading...

Make:

Select make
Back
  • loading...

Generation:

Select generation
  • Vectra
  • Mokka
  • Antara
  • Astra
  • SPORTS TOURER
  • Meriva
  • Zafira Tourer
Review tone
Reviews found: 0
Hawk Performance Brake pads
econsj
Rating 4.5
  • Braking:
  • Dust:

if you are sick and tired of scrubbing your wheels then i would highly recommend ceramic pads as the dust is a fraction of the OEM pads. I just changed out mine a few months ago (hawk ceramic from pelican parts) and the change is night and day. I don't track may car and i would say i'm mildly spirited in my driving, but these have been great so far.

Pros: less dust, night and day change
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
Tylpt
Rating 5.0
  • Braking:
  • Dust:

I had about 21,000 kms on my GLI and noticed a little bit of vibration at higher speed braking. I was sick of the OEM pads dust so I swapped out the pads to Hawk HPS street 5.0's. The front rotors had a ton of wear on it for a relatively new car. I heard from a few shops that the OEM pads eat rotors. I decided to change the front rotors but kept the rears as there was hardly any wear on it. Brake pedal feels much more solid and next to no brake dust and better braking power. Great upgrade and strongly recommend.

Pros: better braking power, less dust
Cons: front rotors wear
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 21000 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
UniverseCatalyzed
Rating 4.0
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:

Hawk HP+ is a very good multiuse pad if you can get them for your car. Be warned - they will squeak pretty loudly and dust your wheels, but they work fine on the street, great in the canyons, and will still last at least a few sessions on track.

Pros: good multiuse, works well on street and canyons
Cons: squeaks loudly, dusts wheels
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
Nightmare164
Rating 4.0
  • Noise:
  • Dust:

Stock pads were driving me insane so I switched to ceramic Hawks. I don't track my car and the noise is gone so I'm happy with them. I don't have to clean the car that often either since the dust is minimal.

Pros: minimal dust, no noise
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads

With those rotors, Hawk HPS+ pads, ATE Typ200 fluid, and TyrolSport caliper stiffening bushings, the thing stops very well for DD use. Still gonna fade hard after a relatively short while though.

Pros: stops very well
Cons: fade hard after a while
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
WILWOOD Brake pads

I don't know much about Stop-Tech, however, I have heard from a friend that used Wilwood that these perform best in non-Winter driving conditions. He said that over time they will not stand up as well as a Brembo set up. It might be worth noting what climate (Alaska vs California) that you spend most of your driving time in as well when factoring a BBK upgrade. I also noticed that you are quite new to this group so allow me to introduce you to the member who will derail all original posts into something else to the point where your thread may get locked up. See below. GoGo Golf R said: Ok let's try to agree on the following: 1) Upgrading the brakes is mostly justified for track driving purposes No, Personal preference. 2) Changing the brake pads will reduce dust for street driving Depends on your pad choice 3) Changing the brake pads, rotors and brake lines is pricy Subjective 4) The OEM brakes, while not totally ideal for every driving style, will suffice for average street drivers and some track drivers Depends on your driving style 5) Downshifting with correct rev-matching, will extend the duration and reduce wear on the brakes Yes because replacing your clutch is much cheaper than new pads :screwy:

Pros: perform best in non-winter
Cons: don't stand up as well over time
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads

I'm not happy with HPS 5.0 on my M3- I'm probably going to switch back to "regular" Hawk HPS, as they have worked for me on quite a few cars.

Pros: worked on many cars
Cons: not happy with performance
Vehicle: BMW
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
1 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ... 41

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Comparisons
Show all

Activity feed

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake caliper ATE has only 9 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake fluid OEM Subaru has only 2 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake discs OEM Subaru has only 8 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake discs FEBI got the first review!

In the rating best shock absorbers already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!

In the rating best windshield already 14 brands participate!

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating battery for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!

The roof rack YAKIMA has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The brake pads G-brake has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The piston rings OEM Honda has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The engine radiator MISHIMOTO already has 300 votes!

The engine oil AMSOIL already has 1000 votes!

For tires GISLAVED already 25 reviews.

The tires OEM FORD already has 100 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

Loading...