vs
Brake pads JURID or WILWOOD
When I had an NC, I put wilwood pro matrix pads on. I did a few track days a year and then drove it daily in the summer. They held up great, but I wasn't super hard on them at the track.
Pros: held up great, good for daily
Vehicle:
Mazda
Wilwood White.
Jurid is good brand, I have ceramic pads on all the family BMW and they are nice very light brake dust on wheels, I used akebono pads, but I would not have an issue if I had to switch to Jurid
Pros: light brake dust
Vehicle:
BMW
New Jurid front brake pads and a new front brake pad wear sensor April 2025.
Vehicle:
Volkswagen Golf
I’ve had these Jurid pads on my 2019 S for about four months now and they’ve been great so far.
Pros: great performance, reliable
Part number: 8V0698151G
For pads I've used Jurid White successfully in the past, they produce a lot less dust than the OE.
Pros: less brake dust
Pads I went with Jurid as they’re oem and wanted strong initial bite. The Jurids nock when I reverse, apply brake, shift to drive and apply again. It’s very annoying. My original BMW OEM pads didn’t do this.
Pros: strong initial bite
Cons: nock when reversing
Vehicle:
BMW
Front brake pads are worn. I have a new set of Jurid OEM pads that will come with the car.
Pros: new pads included
Cons: worn pads
Vehicle:
BMW
Mileage: 160700 km
The pads were about 60% worn and hard large metal shards embedded in them and the rotors have always been badly grooved from day 1. This suggest that its more likely the rotor that is a soft material. Once there are metal shards in the pads that will cause uneven friction and promote brake grab and pulsing. I replaced the pads and the \u201cwarp\u201d pulsing has gone completely, but I suspect the new pads will also eventually pick up metal shards from the rotor. The other point is in case people want to avoid factory pads is that the front pads are Jurid and the rears ATE. I ve replaced all with Padid.
Pros: pulsing gone, new pads installed
Cons: metal shards in pads, grooved rotors
Vehicle:
Volkswagen
Mileage: 18000 km
In hindsight, however, I do drive 15 miles up/down/through a mountain pass 5 days a week. That’s gotta be the culprit!
Cons: rapid wear
Vehicle:
Subaru
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads OEM Alfa Romeo got the first review!
The brake caliper OEM BMW got the first review!
The brake pads OEM Infiniti got the first review!
For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.
For battery Energizer already 25 reviews.
In the rating best water pump already 12 brands participate!
In the rating best timing belt already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!
In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating tires for Subaru Outback already 50 brands participate!
For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
Which brake pads to choose — JURID or WILWOOD?
If choosing brake pads across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare brake pads across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which brake pads are better — WILWOOD or JURID?
In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads JURID were overall better than WILWOOD.
- JURID received a PR Score of 74 out of 100, and WILWOOD scored 78 points.
- JURID ranked 31 in the overall ranking, and WILWOOD ranked 35.
- The average rating is higher for WILWOOD (4) than for JURID (3.8).
-
Brake pads WILWOOD have better feature ratings than JURID:
- Noise - owners believe, that this property for WILWOOD is better than JURID.
- Dust - drivers claim, that this property for JURID is outperforms WILWOOD.
- Braking - reviews suggest, that by this property JURID does not differ from WILWOOD.
Which brake pads are more popular — JURID or WILWOOD?
In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads JURID were overall more popular than WILWOOD.
By vote balance, brake pads JURID surpassed WILWOOD:
- For JURID, the ratio of positive (46) to negative (16) votes is 30 votes.
- For WILWOOD, the ratio of positive (33) to negative (9) votes is 24 votes.
By number of reviews, brake pads JURID surpassed WILWOOD:
- For brake pads JURID there are 19 reviews: 12 positive, 5 neutral, 2 negative.
- For brake pads WILWOOD there are 13 reviews: 9 positive, 3 neutral, 1 negative.
Which brake pads do car owners prefer — JURID or WILWOOD?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, brake pads JURID and WILWOOD have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.
Other comparisons of brake pads
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of brake pads JURID with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.
Also available: comparisons of brake pads WILWOOD with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.
You can also see who is better among other brake pads manufacturers: EBC or POWER STOP, EBC or Akebono, EBC or Hawk Performance, Brembo or EBC, Akebono or POWER STOP.